These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29247806)

  • 1. Contrasting functional imaging parametric maps: The mislocation problem and alternative solutions.
    Bourguignon M; Molinaro N; Wens V
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():200-211. PubMed ID: 29247806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localization accuracy of a common beamformer for the comparison of two conditions.
    Lucena Gómez G; Peigneux P; Wens V; Bourguignon M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117793. PubMed ID: 33497769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regularized aggregation of statistical parametric maps.
    Wang LY; Chung J; Park C; Choi H; Rodrigue AL; Pierce JE; Clementz BA; McDowell JE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jan; 40(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30184306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images.
    Barnes GR; Hillebrand A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2003 Jan; 18(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12454907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
    Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetric Weighting to Optimize Regional Sensitivity in Combined fMRI-MEG Maps.
    McWhinney SR; Bardouille T; D'Arcy RC; Newman AJ
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jan; 29(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26492915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-parametric statistical thresholding of baseline free MEG beamformer images.
    Prendergast G; Johnson SR; Hymers M; Woods W; Green GG
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):906-18. PubMed ID: 20696257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new toolbox for combining magnetoencephalographic source analysis and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic data for anatomical classification of dynamic brain activity.
    Dammers J; Mohlberg H; Boers F; Tass P; Amunts K; Mathiak K
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(4):1577-87. PubMed ID: 17187996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localization Accuracy of Distributed Inverse Solutions for Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging of Interictal Epileptic Discharges in Patients with Focal Epilepsy.
    Heers M; Chowdhury RA; Hedrich T; Dubeau F; Hall JA; Lina JM; Grova C; Kobayashi E
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jan; 29(1):162-81. PubMed ID: 25609211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A signal-processing pipeline for magnetoencephalography resting-state networks.
    Mantini D; Della Penna S; Marzetti L; de Pasquale F; Pizzella V; Corbetta M; Romani GL
    Brain Connect; 2011; 1(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 22432954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding brain oscillations with power dependencies in neuroimaging data.
    Dähne S; Nikulin VV; Ramírez D; Schreier PJ; Müller KR; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():334-48. PubMed ID: 24721331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source localization with MEG data: A beamforming approach based on covariance thresholding.
    Zhang J; Liu C; Green G
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 24350784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pattern reversal visual evoked responses of V1/V2 and V5/MT as revealed by MEG combined with probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps.
    Barnikol UB; Amunts K; Dammers J; Mohlberg H; Fieseler T; Malikovic A; Zilles K; Niedeggen M; Tass PA
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):86-108. PubMed ID: 16480895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging brain source extent from EEG/MEG by means of an iteratively reweighted edge sparsity minimization (IRES) strategy.
    Sohrabpour A; Lu Y; Worrell G; He B
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():27-42. PubMed ID: 27241482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large-scale EEG/MEG source localization with spatial flexibility.
    Haufe S; Tomioka R; Dickhaus T; Sannelli C; Blankertz B; Nolte G; Müller KR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):851-9. PubMed ID: 20832477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complexity analysis of source activity underlying the neuromagnetic somatosensory steady-state response.
    Vakorin VA; Ross B; Krakovska O; Bardouille T; Cheyne D; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 20132893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical maps for EEG dipolar source localization.
    Bénar CG; Gunn RN; Grova C; Champagne B; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 15759570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.