These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29248599)

  • 1. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false.
    Ioannidis JP
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):28-36; discussion 39-45. PubMed ID: 24068251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
    Jager LR; Leek JT
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The problem with unadjusted multiple and sequential statistical testing.
    Albers C
    Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1921. PubMed ID: 31015469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Novel "Maximizing Kappa" Approach for Assessing the Ability of a Diagnostic Marker and Its Optimal Cutoff Value.
    Chang CH; Yang JT; Lee MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1005-19. PubMed ID: 24918528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study design and statistical analysis.
    Elston DM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 79(2):207. PubMed ID: 29128448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
    Piper SK; Grittner U; Rex A; Riedel N; Fischer F; Nadon R; Siegerink B; Dirnagl U
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000188. PubMed ID: 30964856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CORP: Minimizing the chances of false positives and false negatives.
    Curran-Everett D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Jan; 122(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 27909232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?
    Krumholz HM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 Jul; 5(4):418-9. PubMed ID: 22811497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals.
    Kraemer HC; Mintz J; Noda A; Tinklenberg J; Yesavage JA
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 May; 63(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 16651505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and sample size: how many patients do I need?
    Grunkemeier GL; Jin R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):1934-9. PubMed ID: 17532374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acknowledging and Overcoming Nonreproducibility in Basic and Preclinical Research.
    Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2017 Mar; 317(10):1019-1020. PubMed ID: 28192565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.
    Guan M; Vandekerckhove J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use and misuse of statistical methodologies in pharmacology research.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2014 Jan; 87(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 23747488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating a positive false discovery rate for variable selection in pharmacogenetic studies.
    Li L; Hui S; Pennello G; Desta Z; Todd S; Nguyen A; Flockhart D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(5):883-902. PubMed ID: 17885872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.