These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29248942)

  • 1. Dental skeletal effects of the metallic splinted Herbst appliance after growth spurt: a lateral oblique cephalometric assessment.
    Raveli TB; Raveli DB; Gandini LG; Santos-Pinto A
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2017 Aug; 30(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 29248942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II malocclusion treatment with the Herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak.
    Alvares JC; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; de Freitas KM; Angheben CZ
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(5):38-45. PubMed ID: 24352386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
    Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
    Amuk NG; Baysal A; Coskun R; Kurt G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
    Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
    de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective comparison of dental and skeletal effects in the treatment of Class II malocclusion between Herbst and Xbow appliances.
    Insabralde NM; Rodrigues de Almeida M; Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin R; Flores-Mir C; Castanha Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):544-551. PubMed ID: 34274201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturation.
    dos Santos-Pinto PR; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Júnior LG; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto CC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):43-52. PubMed ID: 24262416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.