These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29248985)

  • 1. On the information content of discrete phylogenetic characters.
    Bordewich M; Deutschmann IM; Fischer M; Kasbohm E; Semple C; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 77(3):527-544. PubMed ID: 29248985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.
    Cummins CA; McInerney JO
    Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):833-44. PubMed ID: 21804093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 28945906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric morphometric character suites as phylogenetic data: extracting phylogenetic signal from gastropod shells.
    Smith UE; Hendricks JR
    Syst Biol; 2013 May; 62(3):366-85. PubMed ID: 23325808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the number of discrete character states for continuous characters generates well-resolved trees that do not reflect phylogeny.
    Bardin J; Rouget I; Yacobucci MM; Cecca F
    Integr Zool; 2014 Aug; 9(4):531-41. PubMed ID: 24148350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combinatorial Scoring of Phylogenetic Trees and Networks Based on Homoplasy-Free Characters.
    Alexeev N; Alekseyev MA
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 25(11):1203-1219. PubMed ID: 30133318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction with Maximum Parsimony.
    Herbst L; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 79(12):2865-2886. PubMed ID: 28993971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference.
    Givnish TJ; Sytsma KJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):320-30. PubMed ID: 9187091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The size of the character state space affects the occurrence and detection of homoplasy: modelling the probability of incompatibility for unordered phylogenetic characters.
    Hoyal Cuthill J
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 366():24-32. PubMed ID: 25451518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An extended model for phylogenetic maximum likelihood based on discrete morphological characters.
    Spade DA
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 32078576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference.
    Simmons MP; Zhang LB; Webb CT; Müller K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):528-42. PubMed ID: 16997581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The State of Phylogenetic Analysis: Narrow Visions and Simple Answers-Examples from the Diptera (flies).
    Borkent A
    Zootaxa; 2018 Jan; 4374(1):107-143. PubMed ID: 29689817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring ancestral sequences in taxon-rich phylogenies.
    Gascuel O; Steel M
    Math Biosci; 2010 Oct; 227(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 20627110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Character congruence and phylogenetic signal in molecular and morphological data sets: a case study in the living Iguanas (Squamata, Iguanidae).
    Sites JW; Davis SK; Guerra T; Iverson JB; Snell HL
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Oct; 13(8):1087-105. PubMed ID: 8865663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Most Parsimonious Likelihood Exhibits Multiple Optima for Compatible Characters.
    Matsieva J; St John K
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):10. PubMed ID: 31932987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships.
    Townsend JP; Lopez-Giraldez F
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jul; 59(4):446-57. PubMed ID: 20547780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Character trees from transcriptome data: Origin and individuation of morphological characters and the so-called "species signal".
    Musser JM; Wagner GP
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2015 Nov; 324(7):588-604. PubMed ID: 26175303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model.
    Felsenstein J
    Am Nat; 2012 Feb; 179(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 22218305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring and testing hypotheses of cladistic character dependence by using character compatibility.
    O'Keefe FR; Wagner PJ
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(5):657-75. PubMed ID: 12116937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.