549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29249021)
1. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Researchers experience of misconduct in research in Malaysian higher education institutions.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Account Res; 2018; 25(3):125-141. PubMed ID: 29394103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unethical authorship practices: A qualitative study in Malaysian higher education institutions.
Olesen A; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Sep; 18(3):271-278. PubMed ID: 30048029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.
Satalkar P; Shaw D
Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.
Godecharle S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1421-1436. PubMed ID: 28913604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the organisational context of research misconduct in higher learning institutions in Malaysia.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z; Ibrahim M
Dev World Bioeth; 2022 Jun; 22(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 33170560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.
Adesanya AA
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2020; 27(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32687128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers.
Palla IA; Singson M
Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Malaysian researchers talk about the influence of culture on research misconduct in higher learning institutions.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Account Res; 2017; 24(8):469-482. PubMed ID: 29087734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research Ethics: Researchers Consider How Best to Prevent Misconduct in Research in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions Through Ethics Education.
Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1111-1124. PubMed ID: 29717467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.
Ayodele FO; Yao L; Haron H
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):357-382. PubMed ID: 29441445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
Okonta P; Rossouw T
Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The challenges for scientists in avoiding plagiarism.
Fisher ER; Partin KM
Account Res; 2014; 21(6):353-65. PubMed ID: 24785995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study.
Li D; Cornelis G
Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):63-94. PubMed ID: 32718198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
