These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29249022)

  • 1. Google Search as an Additional Source in Systematic Reviews.
    Piasecki J; Waligora M; Dranseika V
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):809-810. PubMed ID: 29249022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of searching the German CCMed database for the production of systematic reviews.
    Waffenschmidt S; Hausner E; Kaiser T
    Health Info Libr J; 2010 Dec; 27(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 21050368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits.
    Mahood Q; Van Eerd D; Irvin E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 26052848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updated version of the Embase search filter for animal studies.
    de Vries RB; Hooijmans CR; Tillema A; Leenaars M; Ritskes-Hoitinga M
    Lab Anim; 2014 Jan; 48(1):88. PubMed ID: 23836850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joanna Briggs Institute: an evidence-based practice database.
    Vardell E; Malloy M
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2013; 32(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24180651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase.
    de Vries RB; Hooijmans CR; Tillema A; Leenaars M; Ritskes-Hoitinga M
    Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 45(4):268-70. PubMed ID: 21890653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews.
    Vassar M; Carr B; Kash-Holley M; DeWitt E; Koller C; Day J; Day K; Herrmann D; Holzmann M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Oct; 103(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 26512217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies.
    Delaney A; Tamás PA
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29106042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adapting how to use Google Search to identify studies for systematic reviews in view of a recent change to how search results are displayed.
    Briscoe S; Abbott R; Lawal H; Rogers M; Shaw L; Thompson Coon J
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):175-176. PubMed ID: 38029782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No suitable precise or optimized epidemiologic search filters were available for bibliographic databases.
    Waffenschmidt S; Hermanns T; Gerber-Grote A; Mostardt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():112-118. PubMed ID: 27570049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Briscoe S
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 29065246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies.
    Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative evaluation of PDQ-Evidence.
    Johansen M; Rada G; Rosenbaum S; Paulsen E; Motaze NV; Opiyo N; Wiysonge CS; Ding Y; Mukinda FK; Oxman AD
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Mar; 16(1):27. PubMed ID: 29544510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching the scientific literature: implications for quantitative and qualitative reviews.
    Wu YP; Aylward BS; Roberts MC; Evans SC
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2012 Aug; 32(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 22819996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review.
    Cooper C; Booth A; Britten N; Garside R
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):234. PubMed ID: 29179733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine.
    Lane D; Dykeman J; Ferri M; Goldsmith CH; Stelfox HT
    J Crit Care; 2013 Aug; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 23312123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistemonikos: a comprehensive database of systematic reviews for health decision-making.
    Rada G; Pérez D; Araya-Quintanilla F; Ávila C; Bravo-Soto G; Bravo-Jeria R; Cánepa A; Capurro D; Castro-Gutiérrez V; Contreras V; Edwards J; Faúndez J; Garrido D; Jiménez M; Llovet V; Lobos D; Madrid F; Morel-Marambio M; Mendoza A; Neumann I; Ortiz-Muñoz L; Peña J; Pérez M; Pesce F; Rain C; Rivera S; Sepúlveda J; Soto M; Valverde F; Vásquez J; Verdugo-Paiva F; Vergara C; Zavala C; Zilleruelo-Ramos R;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):286. PubMed ID: 33256642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surveying the traumatic stress literature: the effective use of bibliographic databases in preparing reviews and meta-analyses.
    Lerner F; Hamblen JL
    J Trauma Stress; 2010 Dec; 23(6):819-22. PubMed ID: 20979218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.