These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29249022)

  • 21. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; de Jonge GB; Holland L; Bekhuis T
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jul; 104(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 27366130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of two search methods for determining the scope of systematic reviews and health technology assessments.
    Forsetlund L; Kirkehei I; Harboe I; Odgaard-Jensen J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 22617737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A checklist to assess database-hosting platforms for designing and running searches for systematic reviews.
    Bethel A; Rogers M
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Mar; 31(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 24751228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014.
    Lam MT; McDiarmid M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 27822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conducting systematic reviews of intervention questions I: Writing the review protocol, formulating the question and searching the literature.
    O'Connor AM; Anderson KM; Goodell CK; Sargeant JM
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2014 Jun; 61 Suppl 1():28-38. PubMed ID: 24905994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Method for the evidence-based reviews on occupational therapy and stroke.
    Arbesman M; Lieberman D; Berlanstein DR
    Am J Occup Ther; 2015; 69(1):6901180020p1-5. PubMed ID: 25553741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology.
    Vassar M; Atakpo P; Kash MJ
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):302-304. PubMed ID: 27822152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.
    Vassar M; Yerokhin V; Sinnett PM; Weiher M; Muckelrath H; Carr B; Varney L; Cook G
    Health Info Libr J; 2017 Jun; 34(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 28383159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Wong SS; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct; 94(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 17082841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?
    Cohen JF; Korevaar DA; Wang J; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():23. PubMed ID: 25874584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Literature search methodology for systematic reviews: conventional and natural language processing enabled methods are complementary (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-9).
    Boeker M; Motschall E; Vach W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():253-5. PubMed ID: 26117425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The practice of systematic reviews. XI. The Cochrane Library].
    Boluyt N; Scholten RJ; Offringa M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Dec; 147(52):2572-7. PubMed ID: 14723024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response to letter by Boeker et al. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: further issues regarding the objective and conceptual approaches.
    Hausner E; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():255-7. PubMed ID: 26142113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: reply to commentary by Dintsios and Niederstadt (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-199).
    Hausner E; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():259-61. PubMed ID: 26093311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.