204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29250701)
1. The performance of mobile screening units in a breast cancer screening program in Brazil.
Greenwald ZR; Fregnani JH; Longatto-Filho A; Watanabe A; Mattos JSC; Vazquez FL; Franco EL
Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Feb; 29(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 29250701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography screening and risk of breast cancer death: a population-based case-control study.
Otto SJ; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; Boer R; Reijerink-Verheij JC; Otten JD; Broeders MJ; de Koning HJ;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jan; 21(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 22147362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.
Weigel S; Batzler WU; Decker T; Hense HW; Heindel W
Rofo; 2009 Dec; 181(12):1144-50. PubMed ID: 19859859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Chen Y; Roman M; Lee CI
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 29239711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction in advanced breast cancer after introduction of a mammography screening program in Tyrol/Austria.
Oberaigner W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Edlinger M; Daniaux M; Knapp R; Hubalek M; Siebert U; Marth C; Buchberger W
Breast; 2017 Jun; 33():178-182. PubMed ID: 28419909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 28357655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
