390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29250816)
1. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
Kojima M
Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Noma H; Hamura Y; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):731-741. PubMed ID: 37399845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
Noma H
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A unified method for improved inference in random effects meta-analysis.
Sugasawa S; Noma H
Biostatistics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 31215617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bartlett and Bartlett-type corrections in heteroscedastic symmetric nonlinear regression models.
Araújo MC; Cysneiros AHMA; Cysneiros M
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2022; 94(suppl 3):e20200568. PubMed ID: 36417597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher-order likelihood inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Guolo A
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):313-27. PubMed ID: 22173666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Guolo A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Hamura Y; Sugasawa S; Furukawa TA
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):794-806. PubMed ID: 37399809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for meta-analysis.
Van Den Noortgate W; Onghena P
Behav Res Methods; 2005 Feb; 37(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 16097340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
