These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli. Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech. Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception. Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study. Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audiovisual speech integration does not rely on the motor system: evidence from articulatory suppression, the McGurk effect, and fMRI. Matchin W; Groulx K; Hickok G J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):606-20. PubMed ID: 24236768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts. Benoit MM; Raij T; Lin FH; Jääskeläinen IP; Stufflebeam S Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 19780040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration. Abbott NT; Shahin AJ J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion. Nath AR; Beauchamp MS Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural evidence accounting for interindividual variability of the McGurk illusion. Shahin AJ Neurosci Lett; 2019 Aug; 707():134322. PubMed ID: 31181299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visually biased Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: A Study of the McGurk and Sound-Induced Flash Illusions. Butera IM; Stevenson RA; Gifford RH; Wallace MT Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221076681. PubMed ID: 37377212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study. Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audio-visual speech processing in age-related hearing loss: Stronger integration and increased frontal lobe recruitment. Rosemann S; Thiel CM Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():425-437. PubMed ID: 29655940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference for Audiovisual Speech Congruency in Superior Temporal Cortex. Lüttke CS; Ekman M; van Gerven MA; de Lange FP J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26351991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect. Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]