These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29251401)

  • 1. Corneal hysteresis and anterior segment optical coherence tomography anatomical parameters in primary angle closure suspects.
    Hussnain SA; Kovacs KD; Warren JL; Teng CC
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 46(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients.
    Beyazyıldız E; Beyazyıldız O; Arifoğlu HB; Altıntaş AK; Köklü SG
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 62(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25116770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment.
    Pensyl D; Sullivan-Mee M; Torres-Monte M; Halverson K; Qualls C
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1349-56. PubMed ID: 22878449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters.
    Hwang HS; Park SK; Kim MS
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 13():49. PubMed ID: 24083664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Hautenauven F; Pourjavan S
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Lewis SE; Pensyl D; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Caglayan M; Sarac O; Kosekahya P; Erten S; Ayan B; Cagil N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27709370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
    Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in target intraocular pressure estimation in patients with early primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Sallam MA; Elghareib ME
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):891-902. PubMed ID: 34633607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgically induced changes in corneal viscoelastic properties after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy using ocular response analyzer.
    Seymenoğlu G; Uzun Ö; Başer E
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 Jan; 38(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22799272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the anterior ocular segment measurements using swept-source optical coherent tomography and a scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer.
    Furuya T; Mabuchi F; Chiba T; Kogure S; Tsukahara S; Kashiwagi K
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 55(5):472-479. PubMed ID: 21830059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
    Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.