These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29251541)

  • 1. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
    Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry.
    Chaby G; Lok C; Thirion JP; Lucien A; Senet P
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Nov; 5(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 29037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis: Reliability of Computer-Assisted Planimetry in Measuring Lesion Size.
    Simpson V; Hughes M; Wilkinson J; Herrick AL; Dinsdale G
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2018 Mar; 70(3):486-490. PubMed ID: 28575546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smartphone application for wound area measurement in clinical practice.
    Biagioni RB; Carvalho BV; Manzioni R; Matielo MF; Brochado Neto FC; Sacilotto R
    J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech; 2021 Jun; 7(2):258-261. PubMed ID: 33997567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Wound Trend Scale: A Retrospective Review of Utility and Predictive Value in the Assessment and Documentation of Lower Leg Ulcers.
    Campbell NA; Campbell DL; Turner A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):40-53. PubMed ID: 28054925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring healing in leg ulcers: practice considerations.
    Johnson M; Miller R
    Appl Nurs Res; 1996 Nov; 9(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8961578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparison of digital planimetry and transparency tracing based methods for measuring diabetic cutaneous ulcer surface area].
    Wang Y; Liu G; Yuan N; Ran X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):563-6. PubMed ID: 18630436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
    Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The improvement of wound-associated pain and healing trajectory with a comprehensive foot and leg ulcer care model.
    Woo KY; Sibbald RG
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(2):184-91; quiz 192-3. PubMed ID: 19287267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital imaging versus conventional contact tracing for the objective measurement of venous leg ulcers.
    Samad A; Hayes S; French L; Dodds S
    J Wound Care; 2002 Apr; 11(4):137-40. PubMed ID: 11998594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wound teleconsultation in patients with chronic leg ulcers.
    Salmhofer W; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Gabler G; Rieger-Engelbogen K; Gunegger D; Binder B; Kern T; Kerl H; Soyer HP
    Dermatology; 2005; 210(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 15785049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Pena G; Kuang B; Szpak Z; Cowled P; Dawson J; Fitridge R
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2020 Nov; 9(11):623-631. PubMed ID: 33095125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.