These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29251985)

  • 21. The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.
    Atmaca S; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):371-85. PubMed ID: 21573746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Human sensorimotor communication: a theory of signaling in online social interactions.
    Pezzulo G; Donnarumma F; Dindo H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79876. PubMed ID: 24278201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are goal states represented during kinematic imitation?
    Cole GG; Atkinson MA; D'Souza ADC; Welsh TN; Skarratt PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):226-242. PubMed ID: 28557493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do non-human primates cooperate? Evidences of motor coordination during a joint action task in macaque monkeys.
    Visco-Comandini F; Ferrari-Toniolo S; Satta E; Papazachariadis O; Gupta R; Nalbant LE; Battaglia-Mayer A
    Cortex; 2015 Sep; 70():115-27. PubMed ID: 25824631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cooperative and competitive contexts do not modify the effect of social intention on motor action.
    Quesque F; Mignon A; Coello Y
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Nov; 56():91-99. PubMed ID: 28697981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior.
    Curioni A; Minio-Paluello I; Sacheli LM; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Mol Autism; 2017; 8():23. PubMed ID: 28616126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strategic communication and behavioral coupling in asymmetric joint action.
    Vesper C; Richardson MJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 232(9):2945-56. PubMed ID: 24838557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When Height Carries Weight: Communicating Hidden Object Properties for Joint Action.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42(6):2021-59. PubMed ID: 29936705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interpersonal and intrapersonal coordinative modes for joint and single task performance.
    Ramenzoni VC; Riley MA; Shockley K; Baker AA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Oct; 31(5):1253-67. PubMed ID: 22406503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.
    van der Weiden A; Porcu E; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):537-552. PubMed ID: 35507019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. History of interaction and task distribution modulate action simulation.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1240-7. PubMed ID: 23583971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.
    Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Top Cogn Sci; 2009 Apr; 1(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 25164938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can discrete joint action be synergistic? Studying the stabilization of interpersonal hand coordination.
    Romero V; Kallen R; Riley MA; Richardson MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1223-35. PubMed ID: 26052696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensorimotor communication fosters trust and generosity: The role of effort and signal utility.
    McEllin L; Michael J
    Cognition; 2022 Jul; 224():105066. PubMed ID: 35219952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple Frames of Reference Are Used During the Selection and Planning of a Sequential Joint Action.
    Ray M; Welsh TN
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():542. PubMed ID: 29765341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural basis of understanding communicative actions: Changes associated with knowing the actor's intention and the meanings of the actions.
    Möttönen R; Farmer H; Watkins KE
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():230-237. PubMed ID: 26752450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Co-actors represent each other's task regularity through social statistical learning.
    Zheng Z; Wang J
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105411. PubMed ID: 36821997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Woźniak M; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Aug; 131():73-83. PubMed ID: 31153967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.