BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29252195)

  • 1. Interest of systematic tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Liberatore M; Cucchi JM; Fighiera M; Binet A; Missana MC; Brunner P; Mourou MY; Iannessi A
    Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig; 2017 Dec; 32(2):. PubMed ID: 29252195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N; Sechopoulos I; Mattsson S
    Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25554018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
    Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program.
    Sharpe RE; Venkataraman S; Phillips J; Dialani V; Fein-Zachary VJ; Prakash S; Slanetz PJ; Mehta TS
    Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 26458206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.
    Gennaro G; Bernardi D; Houssami N
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 28819862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening.
    Hodgson R; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Harvey SC; Edwards M; Shaikh J; Arber M; Glanville J
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():52-61. PubMed ID: 27212700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Skaane P
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis with Synthetic Mammography in Comparison to Full Field Digital Mammography.
    Khanani S; Hruska C; Lazar A; Hoernig M; Hebecker A; Obuchowski N
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 35491345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of noncalcified breast cancer in patients with extremely dense breasts using digital breast tomosynthesis compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Yi A; Chang JM; Shin SU; Chu AJ; Cho N; Noh DY; Moon WK
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180101. PubMed ID: 30235008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.