These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29252209)

  • 41. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment.
    Ambwani S; Boeka AG; Brown JD; Byrne TK; Budak AR; Sarwer DB; Fabricatore AN; Morey LC; O'Neil PM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 21924688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measuring social desirability bias: Do the full and short versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale matter?
    Tan HC; Ho JA; Kumarusamy R; Sambasivan M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022 Jul; 17(3):382-400. PubMed ID: 34612754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Suicide ideation and social desirability among school-aged young people.
    Miotto P; Preti A
    J Adolesc; 2008 Aug; 31(4):519-33. PubMed ID: 17868799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of Acute Trauma Exposure Response for FIRE-EMS Personnel.
    Hoffmann MC
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):458-475. PubMed ID: 28009592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
    Fukuhara H; Paek I
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Understanding self-report Multidimensional Attitudes Scale Toward People with Disabilities: An exploratory analysis.
    Lu J; Kim KH
    Rehabil Psychol; 2017 May; 62(2):110-118. PubMed ID: 28383946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Socially desirable responding and impression management in the endorsement of love styles.
    Davies MF
    J Psychol; 2001 Sep; 135(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 11804008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal studies.
    Crutzen R; Göritz AS
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Nov; 10():720. PubMed ID: 21092267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Implications of Item Keying and Item Valence for the Investigation of Construct Dimensionality.
    Kam CC; Meyer JP
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 26610157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Socially desirable responding on the web: investigating the candor hypothesis.
    Risko EF; Quilty LC; Oakman JM
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 17134335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness.
    Chin WY; Choi EP; Chan KT; Wong CK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135131. PubMed ID: 26252739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Back pain and social isolation: cross-sectional validation of the friendship scale for use in studies on low back pain.
    Hawthorne G; de Morton N; Kent P
    Clin J Pain; 2013 Mar; 29(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 23369929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Note on Goldfried's cross validation of Marlowe-Crowne social desirability items.
    Milburn TW
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Apr; 22(2):653-4. PubMed ID: 5650267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating Model-Data Fit by Comparing Parametric and Nonparametric Item Response Functions: Application of a Tukey-Hann Procedure.
    Jennings JK; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 28453499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.
    Sabourin S; Valois P; Lussier Y
    Psychol Assess; 2005 Mar; 17(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 15769225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sample Size and Probability Threshold Considerations with the Tailored Data Method.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 28027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics.
    Wu M; Adams RJ
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 24064576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Social desirability, social intelligence and self-rated oral health status and behaviours.
    Dumitrescu AL; Kawamura M; Toma C; Lascu V
    Rom J Intern Med; 2007; 45(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 18767416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.