These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29252900)

  • 1. Accommodation in Early Presbyopes Fit with Bilateral or Unilateral Near Add.
    Almutairi MS; Altoaimi BH; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 95(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29252900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of monovision on dynamic accommodation of early presbyopes.
    Almutairi MS; Altoaimi BH; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Jan; 40(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 31879995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodation and pupil behaviour of binocularly viewing early presbyopes.
    Almutairi MS; Altoaimi BH; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):128-140. PubMed ID: 28211182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accommodative Behavior of Young Eyes Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum PS; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 May; 95(5):416-427. PubMed ID: 29683985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of accommodative response and visual performance in non-presbyopes wearing low-add contact lenses.
    Koh S; Inoue R; Sato S; Haruna M; Asonuma S; Nishida K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):226-231. PubMed ID: 31327577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accommodative Behavior of Eyes Wearing Aspheric Single Vision Contact Lenses.
    Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum P; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):971-980. PubMed ID: 28858004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
    Faria-Ribeiro M; Amorim-de-Sousa A; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small Text on Product Labels Poses a Special Challenge for Emerging Presbyopes.
    Xu R; Chelales E; Rickert M; Muessel R; Meyer D; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Kollbaum P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Apr; 96(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 30907860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Definitions.
    Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA; Bullimore MA; Craig JP; Davies LN; Markoulli M; Schnider C; Morgan PB
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2024 Aug; 47(4):102155. PubMed ID: 38609792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
    Durrie DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():366-401. PubMed ID: 17471352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retinal image quality during accommodation.
    López-Gil N; Martin J; Liu T; Bradley A; Díaz-Muñoz D; Thibos LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):497-507. PubMed ID: 23786386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-course of the visual Impact on presbyopes of a low dose miotic.
    Xu R; Gil D; Dibas M; Rickert M; Meyer D; Perron L; Kollbaum P; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Jan; 41(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 33150654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective Evaluation of Defocus and Astigmatism Combinations Using Image Simulation in Presbyopes.
    Vincent M; Marin G; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 98(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 33394934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual performance with multifocal lenses in young adults and presbyopes.
    Vedhakrishnan S; Vinas M; Benedi-Garcia C; Casado P; Marcos S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0263659. PubMed ID: 35298476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The influence of ocular dominance on monovision--the interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye's correction].
    Nitta M; Shimizu K; Niida T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jun; 111(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 17601055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality.
    Buehren T; Collins MJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1633-45. PubMed ID: 16040078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [One-year longitudinal change in parameters of myopic school children trained by a new accommodative training device--uncorrected visual acuity, refraction, axial length, accommodation, and pupil reaction].
    Watanabe K; Hara N; Kimijima M; Kotegawa Y; Ohno K; Arimoto A; Mukuno K; Hisahara S; Horie H
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Oct; 116(10):929-36. PubMed ID: 23285840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study.
    Montés-Micó R; Madrid-Costa D; Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):998-1004. PubMed ID: 21552179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.