BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29253155)

  • 1. Mendelian randomization with Egger pleiotropy correction and weakly informative Bayesian priors.
    Schmidt AF; Dudbridge F
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1217-1228. PubMed ID: 29253155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 32(5):377-389. PubMed ID: 28527048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization with multiple pleiotropic variants.
    Berzuini C; Guo H; Burgess S; Bernardinelli L
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 30084873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.
    Yu Y; Hou L; Shi X; Sun X; Liu X; Yu Y; Yuan Z; Li H; Xue F
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010107. PubMed ID: 35298462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization incorporating uncertainty about pleiotropy.
    Thompson JR; Minelli C; Bowden J; Del Greco FM; Gill D; Jones EM; Shapland CY; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4627-4645. PubMed ID: 28850703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Profile-likelihood Bayesian model averaging for two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy.
    Shapland CY; Zhao Q; Bowden J
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1100-1119. PubMed ID: 35060160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
    van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2024 Jan; 111(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 38181732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data.
    Howey R; Shin SY; Relton C; Davey Smith G; Cordell HJ
    PLoS Genet; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1008198. PubMed ID: 32119656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical problem with Egger regression in Mendelian randomization.
    Lin Z; Pan I; Pan W
    PLoS Genet; 2022 May; 18(5):e1010166. PubMed ID: 35507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MVMRmode: Introducing an R package for plurality valid estimators for multivariable Mendelian randomisation.
    Woolf B; Gill D; Grant AJ; Burgess S
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0291183. PubMed ID: 38713711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
    Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
    Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.
    Wang S; Kang H
    Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1699-1713. PubMed ID: 34213007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.