BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29253458)

  • 1. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
    Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
    Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
    Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
    PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1450-1461. PubMed ID: 30190276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
    Worthington J; Feletto E; Lew JB; Broun K; Durkin S; Wakefield M; Grogan P; Harper T; Canfell K
    Public Health; 2020 Feb; 179():90-99. PubMed ID: 31760206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: demonstrating the potential value of comprehensive real world data.
    Tran B; Keating CL; Ananda SS; Kosmider S; Jones I; Croxford M; Field KM; Carter RC; Gibbs P
    Intern Med J; 2012 Jul; 42(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 21883782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: time to achieve its potential to save lives.
    Ee H; St John J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colonoscopies in Australia - how much does the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program contribute to colonoscopy use?
    Worthington J; He E; Lew JB; St John J; Horn C; Grogan P; Canfell K; Feletto E
    Public Health Res Pract; 2023 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 36477980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The potential for tailored screening to reduce bowel cancer mortality for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia: Modelling study.
    Lew JB; Feletto E; Worthington J; Roder D; Canuto K; Miller C; D'Onise K; Canfell K
    J Cancer Policy; 2022 Jun; 32():100325. PubMed ID: 35560263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.
    McIntosh JG; Emery JD; Wood A; Chondros P; Goodwin BC; Trevena J; Wilson C; Chang S; Hocking J; Campbell T; Macrae F; Milley K; Lew JB; Nightingale C; Dixon I; Castelli M; Lee N; Innes L; Jolley T; Fletcher S; Buchanan L; Doncovio S; Broun K; Austin G; Jiang J; Jenkins MA
    Trials; 2023 Nov; 24(1):723. PubMed ID: 37957680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. History, development and future of cancer screening in Australia.
    Olver IN; Roder D
    Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Jul; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 28765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.
    Sharp L; Tilson L; Whyte S; Ceilleachair AO; Walsh C; Usher C; Tappenden P; Chilcott J; Staines A; Barry M; Comber H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Mar; 13():105. PubMed ID: 23510135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.
    He E; Lew JB; Egger S; Banks E; Ward RL; Beral V; Canfell K
    Prev Med; 2018 Jan; 106():185-193. PubMed ID: 29109015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in Australia, Canada, and the Netherlands: a comparative modelling study.
    de Jonge L; Worthington J; van Wifferen F; Iragorri N; Peterse EFP; Lew JB; Greuter MJE; Smith HA; Feletto E; Yong JHE; Canfell K; Coupé VMH; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Apr; 6(4):304-314. PubMed ID: 33548185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.
    Pil L; Fobelets M; Putman K; Trybou J; Annemans L
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 32():72-8. PubMed ID: 27157827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model.
    Arrospide A; Idigoras I; Mar J; de Koning H; van der Meulen M; Soto-Gordoa M; Martinez-Llorente JM; Portillo I; Arana-Arri E; Ibarrondo O; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):464. PubMed ID: 29695234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.