133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29253696)
1. Posterior Rigid Instrumentation of C7: Surgical Considerations and Biomechanics at the Cervicothoracic Junction. A Review of the Literature.
Bayoumi AB; Efe IE; Berk S; Kasper EM; Toktas ZO; Konya D
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():216-226. PubMed ID: 29253696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.
Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How I do it: tapered rod placement across the cervicothoracic junction for augmented posterior constructs.
Clifton W; Damon A; Pichelmann M
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Dec; 161(12):2429-2431. PubMed ID: 31696301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Three Different Options for C7 Posterior Vertebral Anchor in the Indian Population-Lateral Mass, Pedicle, and Lamina: A Computed Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis.
Viswanathan VK; Subramanian S; Viswanathan S
Asian Spine J; 2018 Aug; 12(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 30060383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical challenges in posterior cervicothoracic junction instrumentation.
Balestrino A; Gondar R; Jannelli G; Zona G; Tessitore E
Neurosurg Rev; 2021 Dec; 44(6):3447-3458. PubMed ID: 33754193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of stabilization after cervicothoracic compression-flexion injury.
Ames CP; Bozkus MH; Chamberlain RH; Acosta FL; Papadopoulos SM; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(13):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15990664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomy of Lamina in the Subaxial Cervical Spine With the Special Reference to Translaminar Screws: CT and Cadaveric Analysis With Screw Trajectory Simulation.
Cho W; Le JT; Shimer AL; Werner BC; Glaser JA; Shen FH
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun; 30(5):E535-E539. PubMed ID: 28525474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and Efficacy of Skipping C7 Instrumentation in Posterior Cervicothoracic Fusion.
Tobin MK; Gragnaniello C; Sun FW; Rangwala SD; Birk DM; Neckrysh S
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e68-e73. PubMed ID: 31154099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Surgical treatment for disorders of the cervicothoracic junction region].
Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J; Pafko P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 16194439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurological and functional outcome after unstable cervicothoracic junction injury treated by posterior reduction and synthesis.
Lenoir T; Hoffmann E; Thevenin-Lemoine C; Lavelle G; Rillardon L; Guigui P
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 16934719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
