183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2925392)
1. Is ionizing radiation regulated more stringently than chemical carcinogens?
Travis CC; Pack SR; Hattemer-Frey HA
Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 2925392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Some general problems and the possibilities for the hygienic standardization of carcinogens of a physical and chemical nature].
Knizhnikov VA
Gig Sanit; 1975 Mar; (3):96-100. PubMed ID: 1132727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chlorine industry says EPA rules ignore good science.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6738):718. PubMed ID: 10391226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of 'secondary mechanism' in the regulation of carcinogens; a chronology.
Scheuplein RJ
Cancer Lett; 1995 Jun; 93(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 7600537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Requirements for protection against ionizing radiation from nuclear materials.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1991 Sep; 4(12):1-9. PubMed ID: 10183580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. EtO emissions.
Jorkasky JJ
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1985; 3(5):98, 100. PubMed ID: 10274847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. OSHA evaluates EPA standard for use of EO gas.
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1982 May; 67(5):7, 26. PubMed ID: 10278116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. International lists and regulatory reactions: good science needed.
Heckman JH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 2):S190-9. PubMed ID: 7724849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk assessment. End of an era.
Anderson C
Nature; 1991 Sep; 353(6342):289. PubMed ID: 1922329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. FDA, OSHA, and EPA regulation of the recombinant DNA technology.
Korwek EL
J Parenter Sci Technol; 1982; 36(6):251-5. PubMed ID: 7161657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The uses and misuses of skepticism: epidemiology and its critics.
Ozonoff D
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9672569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products: diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components; computed tomography equipment; removal of a requirement; citizen petition--FDA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jul; 56(147):36098. PubMed ID: 10113838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EPA considering raising chloroform goals for drinking water.
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):290. PubMed ID: 9672557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation protection & regulations.
Milam DW
Va Dent J; 1992; 69(4):12-5. PubMed ID: 1308334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The fundamentals of future radiation protection legislation].
Jung H
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9289034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.
Kaiser J
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Indoor air quality regulation: still blowin' in the wind?
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1991 Dec; 5(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10116276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation safety regulations--the evolution and development of standards.
Dowd SB; Archer J
Radiol Manage; 1994; 16(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 10132555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public health. Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards.
Smith AH; Lopipero PA; Bates MN; Steinmaus CM
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2145-6. PubMed ID: 12077388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An overview of radiation safety regulatory recommendations and requirements.
Balter S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Aug; 47(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 10470480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
