These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2925392)
61. Reference dose of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Dourson ML Scand J Work Environ Health; 1993; 19 Suppl 1():115-8. PubMed ID: 8159958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. [The verified Polish regulations on the maximum admissible intensities (MAI) of electromagnetic fields]. Koradecka D; Wincenciak S Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):311-3; author reply 313-5. PubMed ID: 17125038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Federal issues and trends affecting dentistry. Long SJ Tex Dent J; 2004 Sep; 121(9):896-7. PubMed ID: 15580754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Health care environmental issues: what does the future hold? McLarney VJ; Weisman E; Kroc K Health Facil Manage; 1993 Feb; 6(2):18-20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10123284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Industrial hygiene with no limits. Tarlau ES Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jan; 51(1):A9-10. PubMed ID: 2301249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Why the 1968 Act for Radiation Control for Health and Safety is required. Morgan KZ Radiology; 1971 Jun; 99(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 5578704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The great chemical unknown. Only a tiny fraction of the compounds around us have been tested for safety. Fischetti M Sci Am; 2010 Nov; 303(5):92. PubMed ID: 21033292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. A cleaner bill of health. Black H Environ Health Perspect; 1996 May; 104(5):488-90. PubMed ID: 8743435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. New scientific evidence and public health imperatives. Ashford NA N Engl J Med; 1987 Apr; 316(17):1084-5. PubMed ID: 3561461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968. A radiologist's point of view. Friedell HL Radiology; 1971 Jun; 99(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 5578706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Carcinogens and human health: Part 3. Cogliano VJ; Farland WH; Preuss PW; Wiltse JA; Rhomberg LR; Chen CW; Mass MJ; Nosnow S; White PD; Parker JC Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4994):606-8. PubMed ID: 1992511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. [The admissibility into Italian regulations of the TLV. The paragraph on occupational carcinogens]. Colato O Med Lav; 1991; 82(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 1865849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Is industry influencing carcinogen assessments in the USA? Furlow B Lancet Oncol; 2011 Aug; 12(8):731-2. PubMed ID: 21928490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. So carcinogens have thresholds: how do we decide what exposure levels should be considered safe? Wilson JD Risk Anal; 1997 Feb; 17(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9131822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Critical review of toxic air pollutants--revisited. Goldstein BD J Air Pollut Control Assoc; 1986 Apr; 36(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 3517103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. The problem of thresholds for chemical carcinogens--its importance in industrial hygiene, especially in the field of permissible limits for occupational exposure. Truhaut R Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Oct; 41(10):685-92. PubMed ID: 7001878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]