154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29254728)
1. Individual and pen-based oral fluid sampling: A welfare-friendly sampling method for group-housed gestating sows.
Pol F; Dorenlor V; Eono F; Eudier S; Eveno E; Liégard-Vanhecke D; Rose N; Fablet C
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Nov; 147():58-65. PubMed ID: 29254728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On-farm evaluation of methods to assess welfare of gestating sows.
Conte S; Bergeron R; Grégoire J; Gète M; D'Allaire S; Meunier-Salaün MC; Devillers N
Animal; 2014 Jul; 8(7):1153-61. PubMed ID: 24762801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows.
Morgan L; Klement E; Novak S; Eliahoo E; Younis A; Abells Sutton G; Abu-Ahmad W; Raz T
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():10-17. PubMed ID: 30388991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimizing aggression during mixing of gestating sows with supplementation of a tryptophan-enriched diet.
Poletto R; Kretzer FC; Hötzel MJ
Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 132():36-43. PubMed ID: 24813705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral fluid versus blood sampling in group-housed sows and finishing pigs: Feasibility and performance of antibody detection for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV).
Fablet C; Renson P; Pol F; Dorenlor V; Mahé S; Eono F; Eveno E; Le Dimna M; Liegard-Vanhecke D; Eudier S; Rose N; Bourry O
Vet Microbiol; 2017 May; 204():25-34. PubMed ID: 28532802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of tryptophan supplementation on aggression among group-housed gestating sows.
Li YZ; Baidoo SK; Johnston LJ; Anderson JE
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1899-907. PubMed ID: 21257784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of gestation housing system and floor type during lactation on locomotory ability; body, limb, and claw lesions; and lying-down behavior of lactating sows.
Calderón Díaz JA; Fahey AG; Boyle LA
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1675-85. PubMed ID: 24663161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social genetic effects influence reproductive performance of group-housed sows.
Bunter KL; Lewis CR; Newman S
J Anim Sci; 2015 Aug; 93(8):3783-93. PubMed ID: 26440157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal study of the effect of rubber slat mats on locomotory ability, body, limb and claw lesions, and dirtiness of group housed sows.
Calderón Díaz JA; Fahey AG; Kilbride AL; Green LE; Boyle LA
J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3940-54. PubMed ID: 23881683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance and well-being of sows housed in pens retrofitted from gestation stalls.
Johnston LJ; Li YZ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5937-45. PubMed ID: 24146159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Space allowance for gestating sows in pens: behavior and immunity.
Salak-Johnson JL; DeDecker AE; Horsman MJ; Rodriguez-Zas SL
J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3232-42. PubMed ID: 22871940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wider stall space affects behavior, lesion scores, and productivity of gestating sows.
Salak-Johnson JL; DeDecker AE; Levitin HA; McGarry BM
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):5006-17. PubMed ID: 26523593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of well-being, productivity, and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls.
Anil L; Anil SS; Deen J; Baidoo SK; Wheaton JE
Am J Vet Res; 2005 Sep; 66(9):1630-8. PubMed ID: 16261839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.
Lammers PJ; Honeyman MS; Mabry JW; Harmon JD
J Anim Sci; 2007 May; 85(5):1311-7. PubMed ID: 17224459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Space allowance and high fiber diet impact performance and behavior of group-kept gestating sows.
DeDecker AE; Hanson AR; Walker PM; Salak-Johnson JL
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1666-74. PubMed ID: 24663162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimising oral fluid collection from groups of pigs: effect of housing system and provision of ropes.
Seddon YM; Guy JH; Edwards SA
Vet J; 2012 Jul; 193(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 22169333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Executing specific foraging behaviours does not represent a general goal state of foraging in dry sows (Sus scrofa).
Moser J; Burla JB; Gygax L
Behav Processes; 2019 Jul; 164():115-122. PubMed ID: 31063789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The physical size of gestating sows.
McGlone JJ; Vines B; Rudine AC; DuBois P
J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2421-7. PubMed ID: 15318743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aggression and cortisol levels in three different group housing routines for lactating sows.
Thomsson O; Bergqvist AS; Sjunnesson Y; Eliasson-Selling L; Lundeheim N; Magnusson U
Acta Vet Scand; 2015 Feb; 57(1):9. PubMed ID: 25884361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
