170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29255923)
1. Real-time beam monitoring for error detection in IMRT plans and impact on dose-volume histograms : A multi-center study.
Marrazzo L; Arilli C; Pasler M; Kusters M; Canters R; Fedeli L; Calusi S; Casati M; Talamonti C; Simontacchi G; Livi L; Pallotta S
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Mar; 194(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29255923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Error detection capability of a novel transmission detector: a validation study for online VMAT monitoring.
Pasler M; Michel K; Marrazzo L; Obenland M; Pallotta S; Björnsgard M; Lutterbach J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7440-7450. PubMed ID: 28678023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.
Mohamed Yoosuf AB; AlShehri S; Alhadab A; Alqathami M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):80-87. PubMed ID: 31605456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA.
Woon W; Ravindran PB; Ekayanake P; S V; Lim YY; Khalid J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):230-248. PubMed ID: 29460465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.
Saito M; Sano N; Shibata Y; Kuriyama K; Komiyama T; Marino K; Aoki S; Ashizawa K; Yoshizawa K; Onishi H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 29500857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.
Zhen H; Nelms BE; Tome WA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5477-89. PubMed ID: 21992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic evaluation of the error detection abilities of a new diode transmission detector.
Sarkar V; Paxton A; Kunz J; Szegedi M; Nelson G; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Zhao H; Huang YJ; Su F; Salter BJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 20(9):122-132. PubMed ID: 31385436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and clinical evaluation of an ionization chamber array with 3.5 mm pixel pitch for quality assurance in advanced radiotherapy techniques.
Togno M; Wilkens JJ; Menichelli D; Oechsner M; Perez-Andujar A; Morin O
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2283. PubMed ID: 27147340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental determination of the "collimator monitoring fill factor" and its relation to the error detection capabilities of various 2D-arrays.
Stelljes TS; Poppinga D; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Looe HK; Poppe B
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1863-1873. PubMed ID: 30707450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical implementation and error sensitivity of a 3D quality assurance protocol for prostate and thoracic IMRT.
Gueorguiev G; Cotter C; Turcotte JC; Crawford B; Sharp G; Mah'D M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):179–192. PubMed ID: 26699299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and evaluation of an integrated quality monitoring system for online quality assurance of external beam radiation therapy.
Hoffman D; Chung E; Hess C; Stern R; Benedict S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28291937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Error detection using a multi-channel hybrid network with a low-resolution detector in patient-specific quality assurance.
Yan B; Shi J; Xue X; Peng H; Wu A; Wang X; Ma C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14327. PubMed ID: 38488663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of one algorithm used to modify a planned DVH with data from actual dose delivery.
Ma T; Podgorsak MB; Kumaraswamy LK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):273-282. PubMed ID: 27685140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
