170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29255923)
21. Sensitivity of the IQM transmission detector to errors of VMAT plans.
Razinskas G; Wegener S; Greber J; Sauer OA
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5622-5630. PubMed ID: 30291724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient-specific online dose verification based on transmission detector measurements.
Thoelking J; Fleckenstein J; Sekar Y; Boggula R; Lohr F; Wenz F; Wertz H
Radiother Oncol; 2016 May; 119(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 27090736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pretreatment verification.
Carrasco P; Jornet N; Latorre A; Eudaldo T; Ruiz A; Ribas M
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5040-9. PubMed ID: 22894429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using a novel dose QA tool to quantify the impact of systematic errors otherwise undetected by conventional QA methods: clinical head and neck case studies.
Chan MF; Li J; Schupak K; Burman C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 13(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23819494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of small MU/segment and dose rate on delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Huang L; Zhuang T; Mastroianni A; Djemil T; Cui T; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27167278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinically relevant quality assurance (QA) for prostate RapidArc plans: gamma maps and DVH-based evaluation.
Cozzolino M; Oliviero C; Califano G; Clemente S; Pedicini P; Caivano R; Chiumento C; Fiorentino A; Fusco V
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 24480527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A technique for quantifying the sensitivity of dosimetric tool gamma with 2D detector array in pretreatment IMRT plans by segment deletion method.
Krishnan MPA; Bhagyalakshmi AT; Holla R; Puzakkal N; Ranjith CP; Vysakh R; Irfad MP; Ramasubramanian V; Hu J; Momeen MU
Radiol Med; 2021 Mar; 126(3):453-459. PubMed ID: 32803540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
Steers JM; Fraass BA
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of DVH-based treatment plan verification in addition to gamma passing rates for head and neck IMRT.
Visser R; Wauben DJ; de Groot M; Steenbakkers RJ; Bijl HP; Godart J; van't Veld AA; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Sep; 112(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 25154319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dosimetric impact and detectability of multi-leaf collimator positioning errors on Varian Halcyon.
Gay SS; Netherton TJ; Cardenas CE; Ger RB; Balter PA; Dong L; Mihailidis D; Court LE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):47-55. PubMed ID: 31294923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Toward optimizing patient-specific IMRT QA techniques in the accurate detection of dosimetrically acceptable and unacceptable patient plans.
McKenzie EM; Balter PA; Stingo FC; Jones J; Followill DS; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121702. PubMed ID: 25471949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diode-based transmission detector for IMRT delivery monitoring: a validation study.
Li T; Wu QJ; Matzen T; Yin FF; O'Daniel JC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):235-244. PubMed ID: 27685115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Accuracy of dynamic multileaf position and influence of beam profile according to change in dose monitor unit in QA plan of intensity modulated radiotherapy].
Okumura M; Hashiba H; Hayakumo R; Shintani N; Matsumoto K; Sumita M; Murano Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jun; 58(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 12518098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient-specific 3D pretreatment and potential 3D online dose verification of Monte Carlo-calculated IMRT prostate treatment plans.
Boggula R; Jahnke L; Wertz H; Lohr F; Wenz F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):1168-75. PubMed ID: 21093168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of an iterative reconstruction method to overcome 2D detector low resolution limitations in MLC leaf position error detection for 3D dose verification in IMRT.
Visser R; Godart J; Wauben DJ; Langendijk JA; Van't Veld AA; Korevaar EW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3843-56. PubMed ID: 27100169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units.
Aspradakis MM; Lambert GD; Steele A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16275566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels.
Nelms BE; Chan MF; Jarry G; Lemire M; Lowden J; Hampton C; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111722. PubMed ID: 24320430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Delta
Petrucci E; Radici L; Borca VC; Ferrario S; Paolini M; Pasquino M
Phys Med; 2021 May; 85():15-23. PubMed ID: 33945949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
