168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29256137)
1. Estimating the postmortem interval of human skeletal remains by analyzing their fluorescence at 365 and 490 nm.
Sterzik V; Holz F; Ohlwärther TEN; Thali M; Birngruber CG
Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):933-938. PubMed ID: 29256137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the postmortem interval of human skeletal remains by analyzing their optical behavior.
Sterzik V; Jung T; Jellinghaus K; Bohnert M
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1557-1566. PubMed ID: 27262481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconsideration of bone postmortem interval estimation by UV-induced autofluorescence.
Hoke N; Grigat A; Grupe G; Harbeck M
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 May; 228(1-3):176.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23562146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collagen degradation as a possibility to determine the post-mortem interval (PMI) of human bones in a forensic context - A survey.
Jellinghaus K; Urban PK; Hachmann C; Bohnert M; Hotz G; Rosendahl W; Wittwer-Backofen U
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Feb; 36():96-102. PubMed ID: 30500672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Raman spectroscopy for postmortem interval estimation of human skeletal remains: A scoping review.
Woess C; Huck CW; Badzoka J; Kappacher C; Arora R; Lindtner RA; Zelger P; Schirmer M; Rabl W; Pallua J
J Biophotonics; 2023 Oct; 16(10):e202300189. PubMed ID: 37494000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparative performance of PMI estimation in skeletal remains by three methods (C-14, luminol test and OHI): analysis of 20 cases.
Cappella A; Gibelli D; Muccino E; Scarpulla V; Cerutti E; Caruso V; Sguazza E; Mazzarelli D; Cattaneo C
Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jul; 132(4):1215-1224. PubMed ID: 25619563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collagen degradation as a possibility to determine the post-mortem interval (PMI) of animal bones: a validation study referring to an original study of Boaks et al. (2014).
Jellinghaus K; Hachmann C; Hoeland K; Bohnert M; Wittwer-Backofen U
Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):753-763. PubMed ID: 29177807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Citrate Content of Bone as a Measure of Postmortem Interval: An External Validation Study.
Brown MA; Bunch AW; Froome C; Gerling R; Hennessy S; Ellison J
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1479-1485. PubMed ID: 29278649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postmortem interval of skeletal remains through the detection of intraosseal hemin traces. A comparison of UV-fluorescence, luminol, Hexagon-OBTI®, and Combur® tests.
Ramsthaler F; Ebach SC; Birngruber CG; Verhoff MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):59-63. PubMed ID: 21237592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of Leptodyctium riparium (Hedw.) Warnst in the estimation of minimum postmortem interval.
Lancia M; Conforti F; Aleffi M; Caccianiga M; Bacci M; Rossi R
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S239-42. PubMed ID: 23181480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Macroscopic findings for the exclusion of a forensic relevant soil embedded resting period in skeletal remains--an approach based upon literature].
Verhoff MA; Wiesbrock UO; Kreutz K
Arch Kriminol; 2004; 213(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 15012038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The temporal degradation of bone collagen: A histochemical approach.
Boaks A; Siwek D; Mortazavi F
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():104-10. PubMed ID: 24836839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of the post mortem interval in skeletal remains by the comparative use of different physico-chemical methods: Are they reliable as an alternative to
Amadasi A; Cappella A; Cattaneo C; Cofrancesco P; Cucca L; Merli D; Milanese C; Pinto A; Profumo A; Scarpulla V; Sguazza E
Homo; 2017 May; 68(3):213-221. PubMed ID: 28404240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the timing of long bone fractures: correlation between the postmortem interval, bone moisture content, and blunt force trauma fracture characteristics*.
Wieberg DA; Wescott DJ
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1028-34. PubMed ID: 18624891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Time on Bone Fluorescence: Implications for Using Alternate Light Sources to Search for Skeletal Remains.
Swaraldahab MAH; Christensen AM
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):442-444. PubMed ID: 27404617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A test of the citrate method of PMI estimation from skeletal remains.
Wilson SJ; Christensen AM
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():70-75. PubMed ID: 27915189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the Scoring of Human Decomposition from Digital Images to Scoring Using On-site Observations.
Dabbs GR; Bytheway JA; Connor M
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1292-1296. PubMed ID: 28120394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of postmortem interval from old skeletal remains by image analysis of luminol test results.
Introna F; Di Vella G; Campobasso CP
J Forensic Sci; 1999 May; 44(3):535-8. PubMed ID: 10408107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of soil environment on postmortem interval: a macroscopic analysis.
Jaggers KA; Rogers TL
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Nov; 54(6):1217-22. PubMed ID: 19761472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do bone elasticity and postmortem interval affect forensic fractographic analyses?
Skinner J; Langley N; Joseph M; Herrick J; Brown R; Waletzki B; Goguen P; Shyamsunder L; Rajan S
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):757-767. PubMed ID: 37057637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]