These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29256766)

  • 1. Impact of Different Visual Field Instruction Strategies on Reliability Indices.
    Rao A; Sarangi SP; Padhy D; Raj N; Das G
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 29256766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing.
    Maheshwari D; Nair A; Tara TD; Pawar N; Ramakrishnan R; Selvi DRG; Uduman MS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 71(2):569-574. PubMed ID: 36727362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Association Between Visual Field Reliability Indices and Cognitive Impairment in Glaucoma Patients.
    Raman P; Khy Ching Y; Sivagurunathan PD; Ramli N; Mohd Khalid KH
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Aug; 28(8):685-690. PubMed ID: 31033782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
    Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of simultaneous visual field testing.
    Kramer BC; Musch DC; Niziol LM; Weizer JS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 22115714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overcoming the language barrier in visual field testing.
    Nesher R; Ever-Hadani P; Epstein E; Stern Y; Assia E
    J Glaucoma; 2001 Jun; 10(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 11442183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of an iPad Application to Detect Moderate and Advanced Visual Field Loss in Nepal.
    Johnson CA; Thapa S; George Kong YX; Robin AL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():147-154. PubMed ID: 28844641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors Associated With Visual Field Testing Reliability in Children With Glaucoma or Suspected Glaucoma.
    Kumar A; Hekmatjah N; Yu Y; Han Y; Ying GS; Oatts JT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 264():187-193. PubMed ID: 38614194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing.
    Katz J; Sommer A; Witt K
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 2023736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.
    Junoy Montolio FG; Wesselink C; Gordijn M; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anxiety in visual field testing.
    Chew SS; Kerr NM; Wong AB; Craig JP; Chou CY; Danesh-Meyer HV
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1128-33. PubMed ID: 26608027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
    Hawkins AS; Szlyk JP; Ardickas Z; Alexander KR; Wilensky JT
    J Glaucoma; 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12671468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Properties of the statpac visual field index.
    Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ["Point by point" approach to structure-function correlation of glaucoma on the ganglion cell complex in the posterior pole].
    Zeitoun M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Jan; 40(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 27865693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
    Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of specific visual subfields in collisions with oncoming cars during simulated driving in patients with advanced glaucoma.
    Kunimatsu-Sanuki S; Iwase A; Araie M; Aoki Y; Hara T; Fukuchi T; Udagawa S; Ohkubo S; Sugiyama K; Matsumoto C; Nakazawa T; Yamaguchi T; Ono H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 101(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 28400370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can DMCO Detect Visual Field Loss in Neurological Patients? A Secondary Validation Study.
    Olsen AS; Steensberg AT; la Cour M; Kjaer TW; Damato B; Pinborg LH; Kolko M
    Ophthalmic Res; 2017; 58(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 28535498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Anderson criteria in early glaucomatous visual field defects with the SITA Standard].
    Suzumura H; Yoshikawa K; Kimura T; Yamazaki S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 May; 115(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 21706836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.