These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29258133)

  • 1. Evaluation of the New DIN Standard for Quality Assurance of Diagnostic Displays - Technical Review DIN 6868-157.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2018 Jan; 190(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 29258133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assurance of image documentation systems. Acceptance test, constancy control].
    Weberling R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Sep; 8(5):207-12. PubMed ID: 9799942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Image quality assurance in x-ray diagnostic units. Information on DIN 6868 standard series].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1985 Nov; 25(11):529-33. PubMed ID: 4089168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Imaging monitors--requirements and pitfalls].
    Simmler R
    Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1020-2. PubMed ID: 24068292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging acquisition display performance: an evaluation and discussion of performance metrics and procedures.
    Silosky MS; Marsh RM; Scherzinger AL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):334-341. PubMed ID: 27455501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany].
    Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
    Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality characteristics of handheld display devices for medical imaging.
    Yamazaki A; Liu P; Cheng WC; Badano A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79243. PubMed ID: 24236113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
    Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
    Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality assurance for CRT display systems--Part II.
    Roehrig H
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2):49. PubMed ID: 10342246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?
    Mertelmeier T
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 10036662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Features and limitations of mobile tablet devices for viewing radiological images.
    Grunert JH
    Rofo; 2015 Mar; 187(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 25389668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of two automatic evaluation methods on Images of the CDMAM test phantom].
    Blendl C; Loos C; Eiben B
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):637-43. PubMed ID: 19513964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality assurance for CRT display systems.
    Roehrig H
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10036661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality assurance from the viewpoint of the x-ray film industry].
    von Volkmann T
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):367-76. PubMed ID: 1410322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis].
    Hoeschen D; Buhr E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.