These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29258598)

  • 21. The Vagueness of Integrating the Empirical and the Normative: Researchers' Views on Doing Empirical Bioethics.
    Wangmo T; Provoost V; Mihailov E
    J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37938498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Interpretation of the reporting specifications for mixed methods systematic reviews].
    Li WW; Liao X; Zeng L; Chu HL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 104(21):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 38825937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments.
    Rooney AA; Boyles AL; Wolfe MS; Bucher JR; Thayer KA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2014 Jul; 122(7):711-8. PubMed ID: 24755067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reviews of functional MRI: the ethical dimensions of methodological critique.
    Anderson J; Mizgalewicz A; Illes J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42836. PubMed ID: 22952615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons.
    Mertz M; Sofaer N; Strech D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25262532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. T-pattern detection in the scientific literature of this century: A systematic review.
    Anguera MT; Jonsson GK; Escolano-Pérez E; Sánchez-Lopez CR; Losada JL; Portell M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1085980. PubMed ID: 36935977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conceptual and terminological confusion around personalised medicine: a coping strategy.
    De Grandis G; Halgunset V
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):43. PubMed ID: 27431285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Making literature reviews more ethical: a researcher and health sciences librarian collaborative process.
    Thomas B; Tachble A; Peiris D; Malhi R; Godlovitch G; Lin Y
    Future Sci OA; 2015 Nov; 1(4):FSO78. PubMed ID: 28031927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An "Ethical Moment" in Data Sharing.
    Heeney C
    Sci Technol Human Values; 2017 Jan; 42(1):3-28. PubMed ID: 28018016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Another "turn" in bioethics? A plea for methodological continuity.
    De Proost M; Provoost V
    Bioethics; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38875473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conceptualizing "positive attributes" across psychological perspectives.
    Wilson D; Ng V; Alonso N; Jeffrey A; Tay L
    J Pers; 2024 Jun; 92(3):683-696. PubMed ID: 37578033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What can the citations of systematic reviews of ethical literature tell us about their use?-an explorative empirical analysis of 31 reviews.
    Nobile H; Moshtaghin NLR; Lüddecke Z; Schnarr A; Mertz M
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):173. PubMed ID: 37740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Empirical and Normative Research in Ethics in Eye Banking.
    Weinlander E
    Cornea; 2021 Jul; 40(7):e13. PubMed ID: 33859094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Systematic Review of Negative Work Behavior: Toward an Integrated Definition.
    Verschuren CM; Tims M; de Lange AH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():726973. PubMed ID: 34777108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy.
    Polonioli A
    Synthese; 2019; 196(9):3841-3867. PubMed ID: 31404228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repugnant Conclusions.
    Spears D; Budolfson M
    Soc Choice Welfare; 2021 Oct; 57(3):567-588. PubMed ID: 34737483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-status individuals are held to higher ethical standards.
    Trautmann ST; Wang X; Wang Y; Xu Y
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15111. PubMed ID: 37704790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The quality of qualitative research.
    van IJzendoorn MH; Miedema S
    Med Humanit; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38889971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correction: What can the citations of systematic reviews of ethical literature tell us about their use?-an explorative empirical analysis of 31 reviews.
    Nobile H; Moshtaghin NLR; Lüddecke Z; Schnarr A; Mertz M
    Syst Rev; 2023 Nov; 12(1):206. PubMed ID: 37941046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: Systematic reviews and observational epidemiology: The more things change….
    LaKind JS; Burns CJ; Mattison DR
    Glob Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 4():100088. PubMed ID: 37637020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.