200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29259087)
1. Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?
Argüelles JC; Argüelles-Prieto R
mBio; 2017 Dec; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 29259087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to Argüelles and Argüelles-Prieto, "Are the Editors Responsible for Our Obsession with the Impact Factor?".
Casadevall A; Fang FC
mBio; 2017 Dec; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 29259091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journal Impact Factor: does it have an impact?
Pierot L; Krainik A
J Neuroradiol; 2015 Oct; 42(5):253-4. PubMed ID: 26278030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Your paper has been accepted for publication.
Munk-Jørgensen P; Christiansen B; Licht RW
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2010 Jan; 121(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20059451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Section Editor's Notebook: Impact Factor--An Analog Metric in a Digital World.
Javitt MC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1153-4. PubMed ID: 26587918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An update on the Journal's progress.
Brennan PA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 19643516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State of the Journal, 2015.
Richards LG
Am J Occup Ther; 2015; 69(6):6906070010p1-4. PubMed ID: 26565089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology: evolution of an electronic journal.
Heinemann L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):226-8. PubMed ID: 22538127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Report of the editors, 2010].
García Puig J; Alonso-Vega GG; Blanco JJ
Rev Clin Esp; 2011 Jan; 211(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 21216398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.
Patrone D; Resnik D; Chin L
Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Sep; 10(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 22871221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
Bonnet F; Samama CM
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.
Barata RB
Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):929-939. PubMed ID: 30892514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud.
Williams N
Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editors, reviewers and the work of the editorial board.
Foster A
Vet Dermatol; 2013 Oct; 24(5):477-8. PubMed ID: 24025019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Demystifying the Journal Submission, Peer Review, and Publication Process.
Likis FE; Swett B
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2019 Mar; 64(2):145-148. PubMed ID: 30920139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
