178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29259355)
1. Comparative study of ProTaper gold, reciproc, and ProTaper universal for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Arslan H; Yildiz ED; Gunduz HA; Sumbullu M; Bayrakdar IS; Karatas E; Sumbullu MA
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(4):222-224. PubMed ID: 29259355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 27054859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Micro-computed Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 5 Rotary and Reciprocating Systems with Different Metallurgical Properties and Surface Treatments in Curved Root Canals.
Kabil E; Katić M; Anić I; Bago I
J Endod; 2021 Mar; 47(3):477-484. PubMed ID: 33217469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and RECIPROC instruments.
Cakici F; Cakici EB; Küçükekenci FF; Uygun AD; Arslan H
Int J Artif Organs; 2016 May; 39(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 27034317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of instrument speed when used in reciprocating motion on root canal transportation and centering ability.
Yildiz ED; Arslan H; Sumbullu M; Bayrakdar IS; Sumbullu MA; Karatas E
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(4):234-236. PubMed ID: 29259358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Three Thermally Treated Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instruments on Standardized 3D-printed Dental Replicas Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Orel L; Velea-Barta OA; Nica LM; Boscornea-Pușcu AS; Horhat RM; Talpos-Niculescu RM; Sinescu C; Duma VF; Vulcanescu DD; Topala F; Negrutiu ML
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Aug; 57(9):. PubMed ID: 34577824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of dentinal microcrack formation in straight and curved root canals in extracted teeth prepared with hand, rotary and reciprocating instruments.
Martins JCLGD; Oliveira BP; Duarte DA; Antonino ACD; Aguiar CM; Câmara AC
Int Endod J; 2021 Aug; 54(8):1362-1368. PubMed ID: 33760261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study.
Mustafa M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 35656678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of ProTaper and SafeSider in Preparation of Curved Root Canals: A CBCT Evaluation.
Delgoshayi N; Abbasi M; Bakhtiar H; Sakhdari S; Ghannad S; Ellini MR
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 29707022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals.
Park HJ; Seo MS; Moon YM
Restor Dent Endod; 2018 Feb; 43(1):e3. PubMed ID: 29487834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Canal Transportation, Centering Ratio by Cone-beam Computed Tomography after Preparation with Different File Systems.
Uzunoglu E; Turker SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 26162254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals.
Navós BV; Hoppe CB; Mestieri LB; Böttcher DE; Só MV; Grecca FS
J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 27656071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the ProTaper Next and Reciproc Systems in Removing Root Canal Filling Material with Sonic or Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.
Martins MP; Duarte MA; Cavenago BC; Kato AS; da Silveira Bueno CE
J Endod; 2017 Mar; 43(3):467-471. PubMed ID: 28131411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, UnicOne, and Protaper Universal in Simulated Root Canals.
Maia Filho EM; Rizzi Cde C; Coelho MB; Santos SF; Costa LM; Carvalho CN; Tavarez RR; Soares JA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():690854. PubMed ID: 25950022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
