These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29260268)

  • 1. Computation of the inverse additive relationship matrix for autopolyploid and multiple-ploidy populations.
    Hamilton MG; Kerr RJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Apr; 131(4):851-860. PubMed ID: 29260268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the numerator relationship matrix in genetic analysis of autopolyploid species.
    Kerr RJ; Li L; Tier B; Dutkowski GW; McRae TA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2012 May; 124(7):1271-82. PubMed ID: 22311370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection.
    Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AGHmatrix: R Package to Construct Relationship Matrices for Autotetraploid and Diploid Species: A Blueberry Example.
    Amadeu RR; Cellon C; Olmstead JW; Garcia AA; Resende MF; Muñoz PR
    Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ploidy frequencies in plants with ploidy heterogeneity: fitting a general gametic model to empirical population data.
    Suda J; Herben T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jan; 280(1751):20122387. PubMed ID: 23193129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. REML/BLUP and sequential path analysis in estimating genotypic values and interrelationships among simple maize grain yield-related traits.
    Olivoto T; Nardino M; Carvalho IR; Follmann DN; Ferrari M; Szareski VJ; de Pelegrin AJ; de Souza VQ
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Mar; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28340272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the dominance merit in noninbred populations without recourse to its inverted relationship matrix.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2003; 44(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 12590182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indices estimated using REML/BLUP and introduction of a super-trait for the selection of progenies in popcorn.
    Vittorazzi C; Amaral Junior AT; Guimarães AG; Viana AP; Silva FHL; Pena GF; Daher RF; Gerhardt IFS; Oliveira GHF; Pereira MG
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Sep; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28973748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A rapid method for computing the inverse of the gametic covariance matrix between relatives for a marked quantitative trait locus.
    Abdel-Azim G; Freeman AE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(2):153-73. PubMed ID: 11333832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The empirical bias of estimates by restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models.
    Duangjinda M; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2991-6. PubMed ID: 11811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fast genomic selection approach for large genomic data.
    Liu H; Chen GB
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Jun; 130(6):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 28389770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of dominance components in noninbred populations by using additive animal model residuals.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(4):471-88. PubMed ID: 12441632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference of individual ploidy level using codominant markers.
    Huang K; Dunn DW; Li Z; Zhang P; Dai Y; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1218-1229. PubMed ID: 31070300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of BLUE and BLUP/REML in the selection of clones and families of potato (Solanum tuberosum).
    Ticona-Benavente CA; da Silva Filho DF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Dec; 14(4):18421-30. PubMed ID: 26782490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative derivation method of mixed model equations from best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and restricted BLUP of breeding values not using maximum likelihood.
    Satoh M
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Jun; 89(6):876-879. PubMed ID: 29687542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population Genomic Analysis of Diploid-Autopolyploid Species.
    Bohutínská M; Vlček J; Monnahan P; Kolář F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2545():297-324. PubMed ID: 36720820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating pairwise relatedness between individuals with different levels of ploidy.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Guo S; Dunn DW; Chen D; Ren Y; Qi X; Zhang P; He G; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):772-84. PubMed ID: 25453904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Additive genetic variance and covariance between relatives in synthetic wheat crosses with variable parental ploidy levels.
    Puhl LE; Crossa J; Munilla S; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Cantet RJC
    Genetics; 2021 Feb; 217(2):. PubMed ID: 33724416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple QTL Mapping in Autopolyploids: A Random-Effect Model Approach with Application in a Hexaploid Sweetpotato Full-Sib Population.
    da Silva Pereira G; Gemenet DC; Mollinari M; Olukolu BA; Wood JC; Diaz F; Mosquera V; Gruneberg WJ; Khan A; Buell CR; Yencho GC; Zeng ZB
    Genetics; 2020 Jul; 215(3):579-595. PubMed ID: 32371382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.