298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29262814)
1. Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections.
Bossert S; Kahrass H; Heinemeyer U; Prokein J; Strech D
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 29262814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving 'understanding' in informed consent.
Bossert S; Strech D
Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):482. PubMed ID: 29041981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment.
Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents.
Munung NS; Marshall P; Campbell M; Littler K; Masiye F; Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer O; Seeley J; Stein DJ; Tindana P; de Vries J
J Med Ethics; 2016 Feb; 42(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26644426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Allen J; McNamara B
Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?
Serepkaite J; Valuckiene Z; Gefenas E
Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Dec; 20(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 24136750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them.
Terranova G; Ferro M; Carpeggiani C; Recchia V; Braga L; Semelka RC; Picano E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 22698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Views of clinical trial participants on the readability and their understanding of informed consent documents.
Somers R; Van Staden C; Steffens F
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(4):277-284. PubMed ID: 29111872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank.
Cervo S; Rovina J; Talamini R; Perin T; Canzonieri V; De Paoli P; Steffan A
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():30. PubMed ID: 23899250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing Parent Decisions About Child Participation in a Behavioral Health Intervention Study and Utility of Informed Consent Forms.
Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Sullivan E; Rowland M; Saelens BE; Wilfond BS; Shah SK
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e209296. PubMed ID: 32735337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent: views from Karachi.
Jafarey A
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 17037689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the quality of information about alternatives to research participation in oncology consent forms.
Resnik DB; Patrone D; Peddada S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 19897054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
Jefford M; Moore R
Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The informed consent process in cancer research studies.
Coleman DA
Hawaii Med J; 2002 Oct; 61(10):235-6. PubMed ID: 12491765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.
Paris A; Deygas B; Cornu C; Thalamas C; Maison P; Duale C; Kane M; Hodaj E; Cracowski JL
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 80(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 26147763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials.
Reinert C; Kremmler L; Burock S; Bogdahn U; Wick W; Gleiter CH; Koller M; Hau P
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 24103146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.
Beskow LM; Dombeck CB; Thompson CP; Watson-Ormond JK; Weinfurt KP
Genet Med; 2015 Mar; 17(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 25144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Readability of informed consent forms for subjects participating in biomedical research: updating is required].
Paris A; Cracowski JL; Ravanel N; Cornu C; Gueyffier F; Deygas B; Guillot K; Bosson JL; Hommel M
Presse Med; 2005 Jan; 34(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15685092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
