These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29263483)

  • 1. [Comparison of outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches for multi-vessel coronary revascularization].
    Zhang LF; Ling YP; Yang H; Gong YC; Song ZM; Wan F
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Dec; 49(6):1066-1070. PubMed ID: 29263483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative outcomes of off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries under direct vision†.
    Kikuchi K; Chen X; Mori M; Kurata A; Tao L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 May; 24(5):696-701. PubMed ID: 28329064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.
    Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Puskas JD; Halkos ME; DeRose JJ; Bagiella E; Miller MA; Overbey J; Bonatti J; Srinivas VS; Vesely M; Sutter F; Lynch J; Kirkwood K; Shapiro TA; Boudoulas KD; Crestanello J; Gehrig T; Smith P; Ragosta M; Hoff SJ; Zhao D; Gelijns AC; Szeto WY; Weisz G; Argenziano M; Vassiliades T; Liberman H; Matthai W; Ascheim DD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 68(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 27443431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation].
    Yang M; Gao C; Liu S; Wu Y; Xiao C; Wang R
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1166-9. PubMed ID: 26277515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-Assisted MIDCAB Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study With OPCAB Patients.
    Algoet M; Verbelen T; Jacobs S; De Praetere H; Marynissen M; Oosterlinck W
    Innovations (Phila); 2024; 19(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 38952215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: Hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary revascularization methods.
    Basman C; Hemli JM; Kim MC; Seetharam K; Brinster DR; Pirelli L; Kliger CA; Scheinerman SJ; Singh VP; Patel NC
    J Card Surg; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2710-2718. PubMed ID: 32725629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic advanced hybrid coronary revascularization: Outcomes with two internal thoracic artery grafts and stents.
    Balkhy HH; Nisivaco S; Kitahara H; AbuTaleb A; Nathan S; Hamzat I
    JTCVS Tech; 2022 Dec; 16():76-88. PubMed ID: 36510526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?
    Rodriguez M; Ruel M
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2016; 12(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 27127557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complete myocardial revascularization using only bilateral internal thoracic arteries provides a low-risk and durable 10-year clinical outcome.
    Glineur D; Papadatos S; Grau JB; Shaw RE; Kuschner CE; Aphram G; Mairy Y; Vanbelighen C; Etienne PY
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Oct; 50(4):735-741. PubMed ID: 27084197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients≥65 years with multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Harskamp RE; Puskas JD; Tijssen JG; Walker PF; Liberman HA; Lopes RD; Vassiliades TA; Peterson ED; Halkos ME
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 114(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 24878119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes following surgical revascularization with single versus bilateral internal thoracic arterial grafts in patients with left main coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the EXCEL trial†.
    Thuijs DJFM; Head SJ; Stone GW; Puskas JD; Taggart DP; Serruys PW; Dressler O; Crowley A; Brown WM; Horkay F; Boonstra PW; Bogáts G; Noiseux N; Sabik JF; Kappetein AP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Mar; 55(3):501-510. PubMed ID: 30165487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?
    Patel AJ; Yates MT; Soppa GK
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul; 19(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 24667582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double versus single source left-sided coronary revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic artery graft alone.
    Gatti G; Castaldi G; Morosin M; Tavcar I; Belgrano M; Benussi B; Sinagra G; Pappalardo A
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Feb; 33(2):113-125. PubMed ID: 28801799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Review and Current Evidence.
    Kiaii B; Teefy P
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):394-404. PubMed ID: 31500492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.
    Guan Z; Zhang Z; Gu K; Wang H; Lin J; Zhou W; Wan F
    Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Dec; 22(6):E493-E502. PubMed ID: 31895036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Configuration for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Glineur D; Boodhwani M; Hanet C; de Kerchove L; Navarra E; Astarci P; Noirhomme P; El Khoury G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(7):e003518. PubMed ID: 27406988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Complete Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Nolan S; Filion KB; Atallah R; Moss E; Reynier P; Eisenberg MJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 30(12):E131-E149. PubMed ID: 30504516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Effectiveness of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Harskamp RE; Vassiliades TA; Mehta RH; de Winter RJ; Lopes RD; Xian Y; Peterson ED; Puskas JD; Halkos ME
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Aug; 221(2):326-34.e1. PubMed ID: 25899734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapeutic Efficacy of a Staged Hybrid Technique vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Grafting in The Treatment of Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.
    Liu H; Huang D; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Xu W; Lu Y
    Heart Surg Forum; 2022 Oct; 25(5):E726-E731. PubMed ID: 36317902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.