135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29263539)
21. Microbiological evaluation of clinically suspected cases of tubercular lymphadenopathy by cytology, culture, and smear microscopy - A hospital-based study from Northern India.
Kant K; Baveja CP; Sarkar J; Juyal D
J Family Med Prim Care; 2019 Mar; 8(3):828-833. PubMed ID: 31041209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Role of modified bleach method in staining of acid-fast bacilli in lymph node aspirates.
Gangane N; Anshu ; Singh R
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 18540298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pure neuritic leprosy in India: an appraisal.
Kumar B; Kaur I; Dogra S; Kumaran MS
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis; 2004 Sep; 72(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 15485285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cytopathological Pattern of Tubercular Lymphadenopathy on FNAC: Analysis of 550 Consecutive Cases.
Chand P; Dogra R; Chauhan N; Gupta R; Khare P
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Sep; 8(9):FC16-9. PubMed ID: 25386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the classification of leprosy.
Rao IS; Singh MK; Gupta SD; Pandhi RK; Kapila K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 May; 24(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 11335960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Value of radiologically guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis: a study of 29 cases.
Francis IM; Das DK; Luthra UK; Sheikh Z; Sheikh M; Bashir M
Cytopathology; 1999 Dec; 10(6):390-401. PubMed ID: 10607010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pathological, ultrasonographic, and electrophysiological characterization of clinically diagnosed cases of pure neuritic leprosy.
Shukla B; Verma R; Kumar V; Kumar M; Malhotra KP; Garg RK; Malhotra HS; Sharma PK; Kumar N; Uniyal R; Pandey S; Rizvi I
J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Jun; 25(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 32250546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis by FNAC, microbiological methods and PCR: a comparative study.
Aljafari AS; Khalil EA; Elsiddig KE; El Hag IA; Ibrahim ME; Elsafi ME; Hussein AM; Elkhidir IM; Sulaiman GS; Elhassan AM
Cytopathology; 2004 Feb; 15(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 14748791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of polymerase chain reaction in breast tuberculosis.
Nalini G; Kusum S; Barwad A; Gurpreet S; Arvind R
Breast Dis; 2015; 35(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 25267370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of real-time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy.
Martinez AN; Britto CF; Nery JA; Sampaio EP; Jardim MR; Sarno EN; Moraes MO
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 44(9):3154-9. PubMed ID: 16954241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and Ziehl Neelsen staining in the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis.
Kathuria P; Agarwal K; Koranne RV
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Dec; 34(12):826-9. PubMed ID: 17115440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fine needle aspiration cytology of suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis.
Bezabih M; Mariam DW; Selassie SG
Cytopathology; 2002 Oct; 13(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 12421444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of PCR from the fine needle aspirates for the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis.
Kim SS; Chung SM; Kim JN; Lee MA; Ha EH
J Korean Med Sci; 1996 Apr; 11(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 8835759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative Evaluation of Multiplex PCR, RLEP PCR and LAMP PCR in Urine, Stool and Blood Samples for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Leprosy - A Cross-Sectional Study.
Sharma S; Dayal R; Kamal R; Singh D; Patil SA; Kumar N; Singh SP; Nayak M
Indian Pediatr; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38910370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cytomorphological patterns of tubercular lymphadenitis and its comparison with Ziehl-Neelsen staining and culture in eastern up. (Gorakhpur region): Cytological study of 400 cases.
Mitra SK; Misra RK; Rai P
J Cytol; 2017; 34(3):139-143. PubMed ID: 28701826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dominant marker (inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction) versus codominant marker (RLEP-polymerase chain reaction) for laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: A comparative evaluation.
Mohanty PS; Bansal AK; Naaz F; Patil SA; Arora M; Singh M
Int J Mycobacteriol; 2020; 9(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 32474483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology, culture, and PCR in diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.
Mittal P; Handa U; Mohan H; Gupta V
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):822-6. PubMed ID: 21994193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the modified fluorescent method and conventional Ziehl-Neelsen method in the detection of acidfast bacilli in lymphnode aspirates.
Annam V; Kulkarni MH; Puranik RB
Cytojournal; 2009 Jul; 6():13. PubMed ID: 19680441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction using insertion sequence 6110 (IS6110) and mycobacterial protein fraction from BCG of Rm 0.64 in electrophoresis target genes for diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis.
Sharma K; Gupta N; Sharma A; Singh G; Gupta PK; Rajwanshi A; Varma SC; Sharma M
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2013; 31(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23508425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Polymerase chain reaction vs. conventional diagnosis in fine needle aspirates of tuberculous lymph nodes.
Goel MM; Ranjan V; Dhole TN; Srivastava AN; Mehrotra A; Kushwaha MR; Jain A
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 11393063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
