These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29264830)

  • 1. The Leiden Manifesto and Research Assessment.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):643-644. PubMed ID: 29264830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
    Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation.
    Zhang L; Rousseau R; Sivertsen G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174205. PubMed ID: 28350849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Scientific Journal Validity, It's Articles and Their Authors.
    Masic I; Begic E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 226():9-14. PubMed ID: 27350453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emerging concepts in high-impact publishing: insights from the First Brazilian Colloquium on High Impact Research and Publishing.
    Matarese V
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2010; 46(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 21169678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A commentary on misuses of the impact factor.
    Wróblewski AK
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 19043674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
    La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
    Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quantitative parameters to evaluate the publication of scientific papers].
    Petroianu A
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2003; 49(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 12886395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Citations, impact factors and shady publication practices: how should the lasting clinical and social value of research really be measured?
    O'Connor SJ
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 Mar; 19(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 20486987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Self-citations: the stepchildren of scientometrics?].
    Schubert A
    Orv Hetil; 2016 Aug; 157(32):1289-93. PubMed ID: 27499288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Actors of journal publishing in the social and medical sciences].
    Schubert A
    Orv Hetil; 2015 Apr; 156(16):650-3. PubMed ID: 25864141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [H-index--a good measure of research activity?].
    Hagve TA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2011 Dec; 131(24):2494-6. PubMed ID: 22170140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties].
    Harsányi L; Weltner J; Zaránd A
    Magy Seb; 2013 Feb; 66(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 23428722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What does impact factor depend upon?
    Roussakis AG; Stamatelopoulos A; Balaka C
    J BUON; 2007; 12(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 17918300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The evaluation of science].
    Ramiro-H M; Cruz-A JE; García-Gómez F
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55(5):548-549. PubMed ID: 29193929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journal bibliometrics indicators and citation ethics: a discussion of current issues.
    Huggett S
    Atherosclerosis; 2013 Oct; 230(2):275-7. PubMed ID: 24075756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].
    Gensini GF; Conti AA
    Ann Ital Med Int; 1999; 14(2):130-3; discussion 134-5. PubMed ID: 10399377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some misuses of Journal Impact Factor in research evaluation.
    Rey-Rocha J; Martín-Sempere MJ; Martínez-Frías J; López-Vera F
    Cortex; 2001 Sep; 37(4):595-7. PubMed ID: 11721874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bibliometric indicators for evaluation of research work. 2. Citations and their analysis].
    Petrak J
    Lijec Vjesn; 2001; 123(5-6):129-34. PubMed ID: 11554113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Scientific literature: bibliometric and bibliographic indicators as integrative criteria for an objective evaluation of research activity].
    Dracos A; Cognetti G
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(3):381-90. PubMed ID: 8712583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.