These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29265853)

  • 1. Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):218-244. PubMed ID: 29265853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK; Kalish ML
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104223. PubMed ID: 32092549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do modals identify better models? A comparison of signal detection and probabilistic models of inductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E; Kelly LJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Aug; 112():1-24. PubMed ID: 30974308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental models and probabilistic thinking.
    Johnson-Laird PN
    Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):189-209. PubMed ID: 8039361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dimensionality of the remember-know task: a state-trace analysis.
    Dunn JC
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):426-46. PubMed ID: 18426296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A dynamic model of reasoning and memory.
    Hawkins GE; Hayes BK; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):155-180. PubMed ID: 26569129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's and adults' evaluation of the certainty of deductive inferences, inductive inferences, and guesses.
    Pillow BH
    Child Dev; 2002; 73(3):779-92. PubMed ID: 12038551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structure induction in diagnostic causal reasoning.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R; Waldmann MR
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):277-301. PubMed ID: 25090421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1208-15. PubMed ID: 26148720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A relevance theory of induction.
    Medin DL; Coley JD; Storms G; Hayes BK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):517-32. PubMed ID: 14620347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective sampling and inductive inference: Drawing inferences based on observed and missing evidence.
    Hayes BK; Banner S; Forrester S; Navarro DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Sep; 113():101221. PubMed ID: 31200210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning.
    Goel V; Gold B; Kapur S; Houle S
    Neuroreport; 1997 Mar; 8(5):1305-10. PubMed ID: 9175134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.