These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29265924)

  • 1. TV, Social Media, and College Students' Binge Drinking Intentions: Moderated Mediation Models.
    Yang B; Zhao X
    J Health Commun; 2018; 23(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 29265924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Norm-Based Messages on College Students' Binge Drinking Intentions: Considering Norm Type, Regulatory Mode, and Level of Alcohol Consumption.
    Yang B; Nan X
    Health Commun; 2019 Dec; 34(14):1711-1720. PubMed ID: 30198778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of peer and parental norms on first-generation college students' binge drinking trajectories.
    DiGuiseppi GT; Davis JP; Meisel MK; Clark MA; Roberson ML; Ott MQ; Barnett NP
    Addict Behav; 2020 Apr; 103():106227. PubMed ID: 31884375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the relationship between social norms, alcohol-induced blackouts, and intentions to blackout among college students.
    Ward RM; Guo Y
    Alcohol; 2020 Aug; 86():35-41. PubMed ID: 32224219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Moderating Role of Close versus Distal Peer Injunctive Norms and Interdependent Self-Construal in the Effects of Descriptive Norms on College Drinking.
    Yang B
    Health Commun; 2018 Jun; 33(6):762-770. PubMed ID: 28422518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resistance to peer influence moderates the relationship between perceived (but not actual) peer norms and binge drinking in a college student social network.
    DiGuiseppi GT; Meisel MK; Balestrieri SG; Ott MQ; Cox MJ; Clark MA; Barnett NP
    Addict Behav; 2018 May; 80():47-52. PubMed ID: 29331611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Opinion Climate, Efficacy Messages, and Publicness of Social Media on Intentions to Retransmit Anti-Binge Drinking Messages on Facebook.
    Luo M; Wang N; Bigman CA
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Nov; 22(11):677-683. PubMed ID: 31697597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory moderates the association between perceived norms and heavy episodic drinking among college students.
    Tahaney KD; Palfai TP
    Addict Behav; 2018 Jun; 81():46-49. PubMed ID: 29425792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining how presumed media influence affects social norms and adolescents' attitudes and drinking behavior intentions in rural Thailand.
    Ho SS; Poorisat T; Neo RL; Detenber BH
    J Health Commun; 2014; 19(3):282-302. PubMed ID: 24354888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer, social media, and alcohol marketing influences on college student drinking.
    Roberson AA; McKinney C; Walker C; Coleman A
    J Am Coll Health; 2018 Jul; 66(5):369-379. PubMed ID: 29405857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the theory of planned behaviour and implementation intentions to reduce binge drinking in new university students.
    Norman P; Webb TL; Millings A
    Psychol Health; 2019 Apr; 34(4):478-496. PubMed ID: 30636436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between social network characteristics, alcohol use, and alcohol-related consequences in a large network of first-year college students: How do peer drinking norms fit in?
    DiGuiseppi GT; Meisel MK; Balestrieri SG; Ott MQ; Clark MA; Barnett NP
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2018 Dec; 32(8):914-921. PubMed ID: 30265059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How Do Gain-Loss Frames and Cultural Arguments Persuade? Designing Effective Messages to Weaken College Students' Binge-Drinking Intentions.
    Hong SJ; Kim Y
    J Health Commun; 2024 Apr; 29(4):233-243. PubMed ID: 38380902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collegiate Binge Drinking and Social Media Use Among Hispanics and Non-Hispanics.
    Ceballos NA; Howard K; Dailey S; Sharma S; Grimes T
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2018 Nov; 79(6):868-875. PubMed ID: 30573017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-Deprecating Humor Versus Other-Deprecating Humor in Health Messages.
    Lee JY; Slater MD; Tchernev J
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1185-95. PubMed ID: 26020507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal Associations Between Perceptions of Peer Group Drinking Norms and Students' Alcohol Use Frequency Within College Sport Teams.
    Graupensperger S; Turrisi R; Jones D; Evans MB
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2020 Feb; 44(2):541-552. PubMed ID: 31943243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Exploration of the Associations of Alcohol-Related Social Media Use and Message Interpretation Outcomes to Problem Drinking Among College Students.
    Hoffman EW; Austin EW; Pinkleton BE; Austin BW
    Health Commun; 2017 Jul; 32(7):864-871. PubMed ID: 27421038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting College Student Drinking and Smoking Intentions With Cognitively Accessible Attitudes and Norms.
    Rhodes N; Potocki B; Thomas S
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Apr; 46(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 30628482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic characteristics of groups and individuals that amplify adherence to perceived drinking norms in college club sport teams: A longitudinal multilevel investigation.
    Graupensperger S; Turrisi R; Jones D; Evans MB
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2021 May; 35(3):351-365. PubMed ID: 32584052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploration of the Independent and Joint Influences of Social Norms and Drinking Motives on Korean College Students' Alcohol Consumption.
    Choi J; Park DJ; Noh GY
    J Health Commun; 2016 Jun; 21(6):678-87. PubMed ID: 27187185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.