222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29265956)
1. Comparative Safety of Needle, EndoActivator, and Laser-Activated Irrigation in Overinstrumented Root Canals.
Genc Sen O; Kaya M
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Apr; 36(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 29265956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectrophotometric determination of irrigant extrusion using passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator, or syringe irrigation.
Rodríguez-Figueroa C; McClanahan SB; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1622-6. PubMed ID: 25260734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite activated with two laser systems and ultrasonics: a spectrophotometric analysis.
Helvacıoğlu Kıvanç B; Deniz Arısu H; Yanar NÖ; Silah HM; İnam R; Görgül G
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 15():71. PubMed ID: 26112918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using different root canal irrigation systems.
Mitchell RP; Baumgartner JC; Sedgley CM
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1677-81. PubMed ID: 22099904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.
Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of Laser Activated Irrigation on Apically Extruded Debris with Different Preparation Systems.
Kuştarcı A; Er K
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Jul; 33(7):384-9. PubMed ID: 26154727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of 4 Different Irrigating Systems for Apical Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite.
Yost RA; Bergeron BE; Kirkpatrick TC; Roberts MD; Roberts HW; Himel VT; Sabey KA
J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1530-4. PubMed ID: 26143609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
Gungor OE; Kustarci A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation.
Vidas J; Snjaric D; Braut A; Carija Z; Persic Bukmir R; De Moor RJG; Brekalo Prso I
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 35(1):205-211. PubMed ID: 31321596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of three different irrigating solutions and KTP laser irradiation on apical leakage: an electrochemical study.
Kuştarci A; Arslan D; Kaya B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 21936720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems.
Desai P; Himel V
J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 19345802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Laser-Activated Irrigations on Smear Layer Removal from the Root Canal Wall.
Wang X; Cheng X; Liu B; Liu X; Yu Q; He W
Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Dec; 35(12):688-694. PubMed ID: 28394240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of low concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and low-powered Er,Cr:YSGG laser activated irrigation against an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.
Christo JE; Zilm PS; Sullivan T; Cathro PR
Int Endod J; 2016 Mar; 49(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 25772335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method.
Azim AA; Aksel H; Margaret Jefferson M; Huang GT
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 28748298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Apical Extrusion during Root Canal Irrigation with the Novel GentleWave System in a Simulated Apical Environment.
Charara K; Friedman S; Sherman A; Kishen A; Malkhassian G; Khakpour M; Basrani B
J Endod; 2016 Jan; 42(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 26547720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different irrigation methods in the presence of a separated instrument: an
Uzunoglu-Özyürek E; Dik Güzel C; Dogan Buzoglu H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2020 Aug; 78(6):409-416. PubMed ID: 32105162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effects of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser, the shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming, and the conventional needle irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigants.
Vatanpour M; Fazlyab M; Nikzad M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Sep; 39():102878. PubMed ID: 35470126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
