These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29266140)

  • 1. Ranking Specific Sets of Objects.
    Maly J; Woltran S
    Datenbank Spektrum; 2017; 17(3):255-265. PubMed ID: 29266140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ranking probabilities for partial orders based on random linear extensions.
    Lerche D; Sørensen PB
    Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(8):981-92. PubMed ID: 14505721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partially ordered sets: ranking and prediction of substances' properties.
    Restrepo G; Brüggemann R; Klein DJ
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 7(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 21534922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hitchhiker's guide to poset ranking.
    De Loof K; De Baets B; De Meyer H; Brüggemann R
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2008 Nov; 11(9):734-44. PubMed ID: 18991576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Serving Duplicates in a Single Session Can Selectively Improve Sensitivity of Duplicated Intensity Ranking Tests.
    Carabante KM; Prinyawiwatkul W
    J Food Sci; 2018 Jul; 83(7):1933-1940. PubMed ID: 29905931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Redundancy-aware unsupervised ranking based on game theory: Ranking pathways in collections of gene sets.
    Balestra C; Maj C; Müller E; Mayr A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282699. PubMed ID: 36893181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ranking using the Copeland score: a comparison with the Hasse diagram.
    Al-Sharrah G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 20426492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on the ranking of near-shore sediments by a battery of tests.
    Brüggemann R; Halfon E; Welzl G; Voigt K; Steinberg CE
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 11500108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model.
    Brüggemann R; Sørensen PB; Lerche D; Carlsen L
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 15032543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data mining by total ranking methods: a case study on optimisation of the "pulp and bleaching" process in the paper industry.
    Pavan M; Todeschini R; Orlandi M
    Ann Chim; 2006; 96(1-2):13-27. PubMed ID: 16734020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pruning Decision Rules by Reduct-Based Weighting and Ranking of Features.
    Stańczyk U
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Nov; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 36359692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias and Stability of Single Variable Classifiers for Feature Ranking and Selection.
    Fakhraei S; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Fotouhi F
    Expert Syst Appl; 2014 Nov; 14(15):6945-6958. PubMed ID: 25177107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the ranking of chemicals based on their PBT characteristics: comparison of different ranking methodologies using selected POPs as an illustrative example.
    Sailaukhanuly Y; Zhakupbekova A; Amutova F; Carlsen L
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22955049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying Influential Nodes Using a Shell-Based Ranking and Filtering Method in Social Networks.
    Ahmadi Beni H; Bouyer A
    Big Data; 2021 Jun; 9(3):219-232. PubMed ID: 34029125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Optimization-Based Method for Feature Ranking in Nonlinear Regression Problems.
    Bravi L; Piccialli V; Sciandrone M
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 26863673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel learning framework (knockoff technique) to evaluate metric ranking algorithms to describe human response to injury.
    Banerjee A; DeVogel N; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S121-S126. PubMed ID: 30570337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dominance-based ranking functions for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets.
    Chen LH; Tu CC
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1269-82. PubMed ID: 24108724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ranking with submodular functions on a budget.
    Zhang G; Tatti N; Gionis A
    Data Min Knowl Discov; 2022; 36(3):1197-1218. PubMed ID: 35601821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new distance between rankings.
    Dezert J; Shekhovtsov A; Sałabun W
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(7):e28265. PubMed ID: 38571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Recursive Partitioning Method for the Prediction of Preference Rankings Based Upon Kemeny Distances.
    D'Ambrosio A; Heiser WJ
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):774-94. PubMed ID: 27370072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.