BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29267521)

  • 1. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Batista VES; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer DP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Splinted and Nonsplinted Crowns with Different Implant Lengths in the Posterior Maxilla by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago Junior JF; de Souza Batista VE; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():3163096. PubMed ID: 30254726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Varying Diameter and Connection Type in Implants with High Crown-Implant Ratio.
    Moraes SLD; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Lemos CAA; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 29267522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
    Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Splinting of Tilted External Hexagon Implants on 3-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Rosa CDDRD; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):697-704. PubMed ID: 34859540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants.
    Bal BT; Cağlar A; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bankoğlu M; Eser A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different Treatment Modalities Using Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Bordin D; Castro MB; Carvalho MA; Araujo AM; Cury AADB; Lazari-Carvalho PC
    Braz Dent J; 2021; 32(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 33914000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress in the Posterior Mandible Using Regular and Short Implants, in the Same Context, with Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Pupim D; Zaparolli D; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e199-e206. PubMed ID: 28708912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 3-D finite element study of the influence of crown-implant ratio on stress distribution.
    de Moraes SL; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 24474362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Generated by Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses in the Rehabilitation of Various Bony Ridges with Regular or Short Morse Taper Implants.
    Toniollo MB; Macedo AP; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos MG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):372-376. PubMed ID: 28291862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types.
    Santiago Junior JF; Verri FR; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jun; 63():292-300. PubMed ID: 27040222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.