233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29267566)
1. How to evaluate and acknowledge a scientific journal peer reviewer: a proposed index to measure the performance of reviewers.
Messias AMV; Lira RPC; Furtado JMF; Paula JS; Rocha EM
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2017; 80(6):V. PubMed ID: 29267566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review: the cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity.
Hillard T; Baber R
Climacteric; 2021 Apr; 24(2):107-108. PubMed ID: 33645415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The multiple faces of journal peer review.
Thatje S
Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ERJ peer reviewers: does this pillar of the Journal's quality need help?
Migliori GB; Soriano JB; Brusasco V; Dinh-Xuan AT
Eur Respir J; 2011 Aug; 38(2):251-2. PubMed ID: 22741165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Citation marketing and networking.
Couée I
Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Aug; 98(8):717-8. PubMed ID: 21656200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review and accountability.
Hardy LK
Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
Muir-Cochrane E
Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How blind is blind review?
Yankauer A
Am J Public Health; 1991 Jul; 81(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 2053657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
Felthous AR; Wettstein RM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 25187283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Art of Peer Review.
Fraser D
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
Brandon D; McGrath JM
Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Publishing in learned journals.
Arseculeratne SN
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Nov; 132(5):525-6. PubMed ID: 21150003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
