These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29267847)

  • 1. Adjusting for bias introduced by instrumental variable estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Martínez-Camblor P; Mackenzie T; Staiger DO; Goodney PP; O'Malley AJ
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 29267847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators.
    Wan F; Small D; Mitra N
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):1997-2015. PubMed ID: 29572890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods.
    Wan F; Small D; Bekelman JE; Mitra N
    Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(14):2235-65. PubMed ID: 25800789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating population-averaged hazard ratios in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
    Martínez-Camblor P; MacKenzie TA; O'Malley AJ
    Int J Biostat; 2023 May; 19(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 35320637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An approach to addressing selection bias in survival analysis.
    Carlin CS; Solid CA
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4073-86. PubMed ID: 24845211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summarizing causal differences in survival curves in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
    Martínez-Camblor P; MacKenzie TA; Staiger DO; Goodney PP; O'Malley AJ
    Int J Biostat; 2020 Sep; 17(2):223-240. PubMed ID: 32946418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment Effect Estimation Using Nonlinear Two-Stage Instrumental Variable Estimators: Another Cautionary Note.
    Chapman CG; Brooks JM
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2375-2394. PubMed ID: 26891780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures.
    Basu A; Coe NB; Chapman CG
    Health Econ; 2018 Jun; 27(6):937-955. PubMed ID: 29577493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instrumental variable approach for estimating a causal hazard ratio: application to the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on breast cancer patients.
    Yang F; Cheng J; Huo D
    Obs Stud; 2019; 5():141-162. PubMed ID: 34223564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
    Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expected estimating equations via EM for proportional hazards regression with covariate misclassification.
    Wang CY; Song X
    Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):351-65. PubMed ID: 23178735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
    MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penalized estimation for proportional hazards models with current status data.
    Lu M; Li CS
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(30):4893-4907. PubMed ID: 28872695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental variables estimation under a structural Cox model.
    Martinussen T; Nørbo Sørensen D; Vansteelandt S
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 29165631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of number of clusters and magnitude of within-cluster homogeneity in outcomes on the performance of four variance estimators for a marginal multivariable Cox regression model fit to clustered data in the context of observational research.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3264-3279. PubMed ID: 38822699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Instrumental variable estimation in semi-parametric additive hazards models.
    Brueckner M; Titman A; Jaki T
    Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 30073669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian random-effects threshold regression with application to survival data with nonproportional hazards.
    Pennell ML; Whitmore GA; Ting Lee ML
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 19828558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.