These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29268672)

  • 21. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial Response Discrimination May Elicit a Simon Effect on a Non-Complementary Task.
    Lam MY; Chua R
    Percept Mot Skills; 2024 Feb; 131(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 38009872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.
    Dolk T; Liepelt R
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2011. PubMed ID: 30410459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of stimulus and response feature overlap in between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Ronconi L; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 26645824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect.
    Philipp AM; Prinz W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2159-71. PubMed ID: 20521212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association between a color and a manual response activation modulates the response planning of typically developing children in a subsequent Simon task.
    Coutté A; Costini O; Ferrier LP; Reymondet E; Faure S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2181-8. PubMed ID: 26269387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Simon effect in action: planning and/or on-line control effects?
    Scorolli C; Pellicano A; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S; Castiello U
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 39(5):972-91. PubMed ID: 25330713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.
    Karlinsky A; Lam MY; Chua R; Hodges NJ
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 28795222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1158-1176. PubMed ID: 28689319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.
    Dolk T; Hommel B; Prinz W; Liepelt R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1248-60. PubMed ID: 23339346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.
    Kiernan D; Ray M; Welsh TN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 22718258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses.
    Song X; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():33-39. PubMed ID: 28823632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The coding of repetitions and alternations in action sequences: spatial or relational?
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):432-45. PubMed ID: 24908075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.