126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29268794)
1. Multivariable regression analysis of list experiment data on abortion: results from a large, randomly-selected population based study in Liberia.
Moseson H; Gerdts C; Dehlendorf C; Hiatt RA; Vittinghoff E
Popul Health Metr; 2017 Dec; 15(1):40. PubMed ID: 29268794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing under-reporting of stigmatized health events using the List Experiment: results from a randomized, population-based study of abortion in Liberia.
Moseson H; Massaquoi M; Dehlendorf C; Bawo L; Dahn B; Zolia Y; Vittinghoff E; Hiatt RA; Gerdts C
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 44(6):1951-8. PubMed ID: 26342584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing underreporting of stigmatized pregnancy outcomes: results from a mixed-methods study of self-managed abortion in Texas using the list-experiment method.
Moseson H; Filippa S; Baum SE; Gerdts C; Grossman D
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 31481033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The List Experiment for Measuring Abortion: What We Know and What We Need.
Moseson H; Treleaven E; Gerdts C; Diamond-Smith N
Stud Fam Plann; 2017 Dec; 48(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 29148056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing underreporting of abortion in surveys: Results from two test applications of the list experiment method in Malawi and Senegal.
Moseson H; Jayaweera R; Huber-Krum S; Garver S; Norris A; Gerdts C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247201. PubMed ID: 33657126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can a List Experiment Improve Validity of Abortion Measurement?
Bell SO; Bishai D
Stud Fam Plann; 2019 Mar; 50(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 30675727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Application of the List Experiment to Estimate Abortion Prevalence in Karachi, Pakistan.
Huber-Krum S; Hackett K; Kaur N; Nausheen S; Soofi S; Canning D; Shah I
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 46(Suppl 1):13-24. PubMed ID: 33326396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the lifetime incidence of induced abortion and understanding abortion practices in a Northeastern Tanzania community through a household survey.
Elewonibi B; Amour C; Gleason S; Msuya S; Canning D; Shah I
Contraception; 2021 Feb; 103(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 33098850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.
Sedgh G; Keogh SC
Reprod Health; 2019 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 30999917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of abortion incidence estimates derived from direct survey questions versus the list experiment among women in Ohio.
Hood RB; Moseson H; Smith M; Chakraborty P; Norris AH; Gallo MF
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269476. PubMed ID: 35657985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey.
Huber-Krum S; Karadon D; Kurutas S; Rohr J; Baykal SS; Okcuoglu BA; Esmer Y; Canning D; Shah I
Womens Health (Lond); 2020; 16():1745506520953353. PubMed ID: 32853055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new approach to eliciting information about induced abortion.
Huntington D; Mensch B; Toubia N
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 8390117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can you repeat the question? Paradata as a lens to understand respondent experience answering cognitively demanding, sensitive questions.
Bell SO; Bishai D
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252512. PubMed ID: 34097702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating Prevalence of Abortion Using List Experiments: Findings from a Survey of Women in Delaware and Maryland.
Kissling A; Jackson HM
Womens Health Issues; 2022; 32(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 34556399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Respondent-Interviewer Familiarity and Repeated Survey Participation on Abortion Reporting: Evidence from Rajasthan, India.
Bell SO; Bishai D
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Dec; 44(4):147-156. PubMed ID: 31294696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The stigma of having an abortion: development of a scale and characteristics of women experiencing abortion stigma.
Cockrill K; Upadhyay UD; Turan J; Greene Foster D
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2013 Jun; 45(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 23750622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paracervical block as pain treatment during second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: an RCT with bupivacaine versus sodium chloride.
Andersson IM; Benson L; Christensson K; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 26573530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constructing a validated scale to measure community-level abortion stigma in Mexico.
Sorhaindo AM; Karver TS; Karver JG; Garcia SG
Contraception; 2016 May; 93(5):421-31. PubMed ID: 26825257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with unmet need for modern contraception in post-conflict Liberia.
Pack AP; McCarraher DR; Chen M; Okigbo CC; Albert LM; Wambugu S
Afr J Reprod Health; 2014 Jun; 18(2):58-67. PubMed ID: 25022142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat induced abortions in Georgia, characteristics of women with multiple pregnancy terminations: secondary analysis of the Reproductive Health Survey 2010.
Pestvenidze E; Berdzuli N; Lomia N; Gagua T; Umikashvili L; Stray-Pedersen B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():85-90. PubMed ID: 27567533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
