These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29269407)

  • 1. Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations.
    Chnafa C; Brina O; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 29269407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flow-splitting-based computation of outlet boundary conditions for improved cerebrovascular simulation in multiple intracranial aneurysms.
    Saalfeld S; Voß S; Beuing O; Preim B; Berg P
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1805-1813. PubMed ID: 31363984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Accurate Lumen Segmentation More Important than Outlet Boundary Condition in Image-Based Blood Flow Simulations for Intracranial Aneurysms?
    Korte J; Voß S; Janiga G; Beuing O; Behme D; Saalfeld S; Berg P
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Oct; 14(5):617-630. PubMed ID: 37582997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
    Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of using generic flow conditions to quantify aneurysmal haemodynamics: A comparison against simulations incorporating boundary conditions measured in vivo.
    Li B; Liu T; Liu J; Liu Y; Cao B; Zhao X; Wang W; Shi M; Zhang L; Xu K; Chen M; Wen C; Zhang M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107034. PubMed ID: 35914441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators.
    Valen-Sendstad K; Steinman DA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):536-43. PubMed ID: 24231854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.
    Madhavan S; Kemmerling EMC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 29843730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
    Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
    Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative comparison of hemodynamic parameters from steady and transient CFD simulations in cerebral aneurysms with focus on the aneurysm ostium.
    Karmonik C; Diaz O; Klucznik R; Grossman RG; Zhang YJ; Britz G; Lv N; Huang Q
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 May; 7(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24721753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions.
    Evju Ø; Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA
    J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2802-8. PubMed ID: 24099744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological outflow boundary conditions methodology for small arteries with multiple outlets: a patient-specific hepatic artery haemodynamics case study.
    Aramburu J; Antón R; Bernal N; Rivas A; Ramos JC; Sangro B; Bilbao JI
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Apr; 229(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 25934258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Link between deviations from Murray's Law and occurrence of low wall shear stress regions in the left coronary artery.
    Doutel E; Pinto SI; Campos JB; Miranda JM
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Aug; 402():89-99. PubMed ID: 27157126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
    Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined Effects of Flow Diverting Strategies and Parent Artery Curvature on Aneurysmal Hemodynamics: A CFD Study.
    Xu J; Wu Z; Yu Y; Lv N; Wang S; Karmonik C; Liu JM; Huang Q
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138648. PubMed ID: 26398847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Uncertainty of Outlet Boundary Conditions in a Patient-Specific Case of Aortic Coarctation.
    Antonuccio MN; Mariotti A; Fanni BM; Capellini K; Capelli C; Sauvage E; Celi S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3494-3507. PubMed ID: 34431017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI-based quantification of outflow boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of stenosed human carotid arteries.
    Groen HC; Simons L; van den Bouwhuijsen QJ; Bosboom EM; Gijsen FJ; van der Giessen AG; van de Vosse FN; Hofman A; van der Steen AF; Witteman JC; van der Lugt A; Wentzel JJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2332-8. PubMed ID: 20627249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
    Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
    J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Parent Artery Segmentation and Boundary Conditions on Hemodynamic Characteristics of Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Hua Y; Oh JH; Kim YB
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1328-37. PubMed ID: 26256976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local Hemodynamic Conditions Associated with Focal Changes in the Intracranial Aneurysm Wall.
    Cebral JR; Detmer F; Chung BJ; Choque-Velasquez J; Rezai B; Lehto H; Tulamo R; Hernesniemi J; Niemela M; Yu A; Williamson R; Aziz K; Shakur S; Amin-Hanjani S; Charbel F; Tobe Y; Robertson A; Frösen J
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):510-516. PubMed ID: 30733253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics.
    Pirola S; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Pepper JR; Athanasiou T; Xu XY
    J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 60():15-21. PubMed ID: 28673664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.