These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29270605)

  • 1. A meta-analysis of perceptual and cognitive functions involved in useful-field-of-view test performance.
    Woutersen K; Guadron L; van den Berg AV; Boonstra FN; Theelen T; Goossens J
    J Vis; 2017 Dec; 17(14):11. PubMed ID: 29270605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incremental validity of Useful Field of View subtests for the prediction of instrumental activities of daily living.
    Aust F; Edwards JD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(5):497-515. PubMed ID: 26782018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive and visual predictors of UFOV performance in older adults.
    Matas NA; Nettelbeck T; Burns NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Sep; 70():74-83. PubMed ID: 24705277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Useful field of view predicts driving in the presence of distracters.
    Wood JM; Chaparro A; Lacherez P; Hickson L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 22366710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer.
    Edwards JD; Vance DE; Wadley VG; Cissell GM; Roenker DL; Ball KK
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jul; 27(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 16019630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and cognitive neural correlates of the useful field of view test in older adults.
    O Brien JL; Lister JJ; Peronto CL; Edwards JD
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1624():167-174. PubMed ID: 26236026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions in a Driving Simulator in Young Adults Using the Useful Field of View Assessment.
    McManus B; Cox MK; Vance DE; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):818-23. PubMed ID: 25794266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between higher order visual processing abilities and a history of motor vehicle collision involvement by drivers ages 70 and over.
    Friedman C; McGwin G; Ball KK; Owsley C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):778-82. PubMed ID: 23307969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association Between Driving Ability and Neuropsychological Test Performances after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Egeto P; Badovinac SD; Hutchison MG; Ornstein TJ; Schweizer TA
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Sep; 25(8):868-877. PubMed ID: 31084639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of cognitive and visual abilities as predictors in the Multifactorial Model of Driving Safety.
    Anstey KJ; Horswill MS; Wood JM; Hatherly C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():766-74. PubMed ID: 22269568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of visual sensory function and higher-order visual processing skills with incident driving cessation.
    Huisingh C; McGwin G; Owsley C
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Sep; 99(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 27353969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the capacity to drive in patients diagnosed of mild cognitive impairment and dementia].
    Badenes Guia D; Casas Hernanz L; Cejudo Bolivar JC; Aguilar Barberà M
    Neurologia; 2008 Nov; 23(9):575-82. PubMed ID: 18307055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The useful field of view test, normative data in children of school age.
    Bennett DM; Gordon G; Dutton GN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):717-21. PubMed ID: 19417701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing functional status: exploring the relationship between the multiple sclerosis functional composite and driving.
    Shawaryn MA; Schultheis MT; Garay E; Deluca J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Aug; 83(8):1123-9. PubMed ID: 12161835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?
    Lunsman M; Edwards JD; Andel R; Small BJ; Ball KK; Roenker DL
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Dec; 23(4):917-27. PubMed ID: 19140660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test.
    Dukic Willstrand T; Broberg T; Selander H
    Gerontology; 2017; 63(2):180-188. PubMed ID: 27764828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations for interpreting failure on individual subtests of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
    Moafmashhadi P; Koski L
    J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol; 2013 Mar; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 23385364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between neuropsychological tests and driver's license renewal tests in Parkinson's disease.
    Badenes D; Garolera M; Casas L; Cejudo-Bolivar JC; Zaragoza S; Calzado N; Aguilar M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 28759268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acquired brain injury, visual attention, and the useful field of view test: A pilot study.
    Calvanio R; Williams R; Burke DT; Mello J; Lepak P; Al-Adawi S; Shah MK
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 85(3):474-8. PubMed ID: 15031836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations between clinical tests and simulated driving performance in persons with epilepsy.
    Crizzle AM; Classen S; Winter SM; Silver W; LaFranca C; Eisenschenk S
    Epilepsy Behav; 2012 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 22341958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.