148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29270605)
21. Impact of glaucoma on executive function and visual search.
Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 May; 40(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 32189400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The useful field of view assessment predicts simulated commercial motor vehicle driving safety.
McManus B; Heaton K; Vance DE; Stavrinos D
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 26890935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Useful field of view as a reliable screening measure of driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease: results of a pilot study.
Classen S; McCarthy DP; Shechtman O; Awadzi KD; Lanford DN; Okun MS; Rodriguez RL; Romrell J; Bridges S; Kluger B; Fernandez HH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 19916131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cognition, but not sensation, mediates age-related changes in the ability to monitor the environment.
Fiorentino DD
Psychol Aging; 2008 Sep; 23(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 18808255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring the Useful Field of View During Simulated Driving With Gaze-Contingent Displays.
Gaspar JG; Ward N; Neider MB; Crowell J; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Ringer RV; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC
Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):630-41. PubMed ID: 27091370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?
Bowers AR; Anastasio RJ; Sheldon SS; O'Connor MG; Hollis AM; Howe PD; Horowitz TS
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():537-47. PubMed ID: 23954688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].
Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Older drivers: On-road and off-road test results.
Selander H; Lee HC; Johansson K; Falkmer T
Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1348-54. PubMed ID: 21545864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is the size of the useful field of view affected by postural demands associated with standing and stepping?
Reed-Jones JG; Reed-Jones RJ; Hollands MA
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Apr; 566():27-31. PubMed ID: 24582906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual impairment and the useful field of vision.
Leat SJ; Lovie-Kitchin J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):392-403. PubMed ID: 16792739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
Puell MC; Barrio A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 18081908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.
Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 38922541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual and cognitive predictors of performance on brake reaction test: Salisbury eye evaluation driving study.
Zhang L; Baldwin K; Munoz B; Munro C; Turano K; Hassan S; Lyketsos C; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 17896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Retraining moderately impaired stroke survivors in driving-related visual attention skills.
Akinwuntan AE; Devos H; Verheyden G; Baten G; Kiekens C; Feys H; De Weerdt W
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 21131257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.
Classen S; Wang Y; Crizzle AM; Winter SM; Lanford DN
Am J Occup Ther; 2013; 67(5):574-82. PubMed ID: 23968796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Useful field of view test performance throughout adulthood in subjects without ocular disorders.
Woutersen K; van den Berg AV; Boonstra FN; Theelen T; Goossens J
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196534. PubMed ID: 29715316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.
Rubin GS; Ng ES; Bandeen-Roche K; Keyl PM; Freeman EE; West SK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17389475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Older drivers and rapid deceleration events: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.
Keay L; Munoz B; Duncan DD; Hahn D; Baldwin K; Turano KA; Munro CA; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():279-85. PubMed ID: 22742775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment.
George S; Crotty M
Am J Occup Ther; 2010; 64(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 20131571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
