These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29270798)

  • 21. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Foraging tempo: Human run patterns in multiple-target search are constrained by the rate of successive responses.
    Thornton IM; Nguyen TT; Kristjánsson Á
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):297-312. PubMed ID: 32933424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayesian approximations to the theory of visual attention (TVA) in a foraging task.
    Le STT; Kristjánsson Á; MacInnes WJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Mar; 76(3):497-510. PubMed ID: 35361003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual search in a multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) world.
    Kunar MA; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1017-31. PubMed ID: 21500946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.
    Bella-Fernández M; Suero Suñé M; Gil-Gómez de Liaño B
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):331-349. PubMed ID: 33745028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cutting through the MADness: Expectations about what a target is doing impact how likely it is to be found in dynamic visual displays.
    Scarince C; Hout MC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2342-2354. PubMed ID: 30362402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Searching for the right word: Hybrid visual and memory search for words.
    Boettcher SE; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1132-42. PubMed ID: 25788035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.
    Stothart C; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):409-415. PubMed ID: 28484947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient.
    Verghese P
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():61-71. PubMed ID: 22929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.
    Einhäuser W; Rutishauser U; Koch C
    J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):2.1-19. PubMed ID: 18318628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Moving foraging into three dimensions: Feature- versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality.
    Kristjánsson T; Draschkow D; Pálsson Á; Haraldsson D; Jónsson PÖ; Kristjánsson Á
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):313-327. PubMed ID: 32519926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response cost to repeated displays--when previous distractors become targets.
    Yang Y; Merrill EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):625-34. PubMed ID: 25666141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding visual attention in childhood: Insights from a new visual foraging task.
    Ólafsdóttir IM; Kristjánsson T; Gestsdóttir S; Jóhannesson ÓI; Kristjánsson Á
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):18. PubMed ID: 28180169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Competing Distractors Facilitate Visual Search in Heterogeneous Displays.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160914. PubMed ID: 27508298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Happy with a difference, unhappy with an identity: observers' mood determines processing depth in visual search.
    Grubert A; Schmid P; Krummenacher J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 23079893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.
    Constantino SM; Daw ND
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):837-53. PubMed ID: 25917000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.