258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29271034)
1. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang F; Huang S; Long Y; Huang L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29271034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Salim R; Schwartz N; Zafran N; Zuarez-Easton S; Garmi G; Romano S
J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 38(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 29203813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].
He Y; Hu J; Zhang X; Huang H; Chen Q
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 25537244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial.
Rab MT; Mohammed AB; Zahran KA; Hassan MM; Eldeen AR; Ebrahim EM; Yehia M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jul; 28(10):1181-5. PubMed ID: 25048751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus.
Xing Y; Li N; Ji Q; Hong L; Wang X; Xing B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():139-143. PubMed ID: 31704530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhu L; Zhang C; Cao F; Liu Q; Gu X; Xu J; Li J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e13251. PubMed ID: 30508911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
Yogamoorthy U; Saaid R; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101158. PubMed ID: 37734661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Rath W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():44-50. PubMed ID: 27521597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method.
Obut M; Balsak D; Sarsmaz K; Tolunay HE; Varlı EN; Şahin D; Yücel A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 155(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 34197641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Liu Y; Duan Y; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2382-8. PubMed ID: 26427519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
Walfisch A; Mei-Dan E; Hallak M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 24939630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
Liu YR; Pu CX; Wang XY; Wang XY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 30315411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical Ripening Using Foley Balloon with or without Oxytocin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gallagher LT; Gardner B; Rahman M; Schoen C; Connolly KA; Hankins GD; Saade GR; Saad AF
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Mar; 36(4):406-421. PubMed ID: 30130821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Baradwan S; Alshahrani MS; AlSghan R; Sabban H; Khadawardi K; Alyafi M; Hafedh B; Alayed NM; Rashed ZF; Abdel-Hakam FA; Elshabrawi MN; Abdelhakim AM; Ahmed WE
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 53(5):102770. PubMed ID: 38503382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
