180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29271058)
1. A finite element analysis of the optimal bending angles in a running loop for mesial translation of a mandibular molar using indirect skeletal anchorage.
Kim MJ; Park JH; Kojima Y; Tai K; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29271058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of optimal bending angles of a running loop to achieve bodily protraction of a molar using the finite element method.
Ryu WK; Park JH; Tai K; Kojima Y; Lee Y; Chae JM
Korean J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 48(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29291183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of transpalatal arch on molar movement produced by mesial force: a finite element simulation.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):335.e1-7; discussion 335-6. PubMed ID: 18774078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indirect miniscrew anchorage: biomechanical loading of the dental anchorage during mandibular molar protraction-an FEM analysis.
Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Holberg N; Wichelhaus A; Rudzki-Janson I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jan; 75(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 24448924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
Çifter M; Saraç M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Finite element analysis of mechanical characteristics during retracting mandibular incisors through sliding mechanics].
Gu YJ; Wu YP; Gao MQ; Yao N; Chen WJ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 18989596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Group A T-loop for differential moment mechanics: an implant study.
Martins RP; Buschang PH; Gandini LG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 19201324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone stress and strain after use of a miniplate for molar protraction and uprighting: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Largura LZ; Argenta MA; Sakima MT; Camargo ES; Guariza-Filho O; Tanaka OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 25085303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of aligner anchorage preparation on mandibular first molars during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners: A finite element study.
Yang Y; Yang R; Liu L; Zhang X; Jiang Q; Fan Q; Zhang H; Long H; Lai W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Aug; 164(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 37024337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.
Ammoury MJ; Mustapha S; Dechow PC; Ghafari JG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 31474262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induced ankylosis of a primary molar for skeletal anchorage in the mandible as alternative to mini-implants.
Angelopoulou MV; Koletsi D; Vadiakas G; Halazonetis DJ
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():18. PubMed ID: 26085484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal Class III open-bite malocclusion.
Roberts WE; Viecilli RF; Chang C; Katona TR; Paydar NH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 26672700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the uprighting movement of mandibular mesially inclined second molars.
Zheng B; Ran J; He J; Al-Yafrusee ESAM; Zhao Y; Liu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Mar; 165(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 37921729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
